Teams

Sports Mall-Johnson/Scharman

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2023-08-10vs RISE AC-Mower/LongsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Tiffany Renfro vs Lindsay Moss / Jenni Price5-7, 2-6
2023-08-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Tiffany Renfro vs Emily Benton / Gretel Sampson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-27vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 10
W#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Julie Labrum vs Sherree Greenhalgh / Teresa Polistina7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-29vs Sports Mall-Kasteler/AffleckLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnji DowDell / AMANDA NEFF vs Gretchen Soffe / Cristie Briggs2-6, 2-6
2023-06-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Tiffany Renfro vs JaNae Smith / Susan Koelliker2-6, 0-6
2023-05-25vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 10
W#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Amber Thompson vs Melanie Vickroy / Roseann Mirsaidi6-4, 6-3
2023-05-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Pamela Roberts vs Denise Daniels / Melanie Hall6-4, 6-4
2023-05-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCrystel Fox / AMANDA NEFF vs Susan Knight / Carolee Romney4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-27vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacie Johnson / Pamela Roberts vs Lisa Hakes / Christine Littleford6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Anji DowDell vs Alli Gardner / Simone McInnis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Alyson Ellis vs Jessica Gardner / Mary Young6-4, 6-2
2023-03-09vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobyn Scharman / Pamela Roberts vs Pam Ollivier / Brenda Fowler6-3, 6-1
2023-02-23vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterLost 02
L#3 DoublesPamela Roberts / Julie Labrum vs Tiffany Pierce / Megan Warren3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAMANDA NEFF / Tiffany Renfro vs Shannon Shepherd / Lindsey Ramage0-6, 4-6
2023-02-09Won 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Labrum / Pamela Roberts vs Emily Benton / Mary Young6-3, 5-1
W#3 DoublesStacie Johnson / AMANDA NEFF vs Deanne Goaslind / Mindy Dunyon6-3, 6-4
2023-02-02vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryWon 10
W#4 DoublesJulie Labrum / Pamela Roberts vs Pam Ollivier / Tena Maughan6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Ashley Park
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.03
Stacie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.92
Alyson Ellis
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.81
Crystel Fox
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Kristi Warren
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 31% · published
3.76
Robyn Scharman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
AMANDA NEFF
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Anji DowDell
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.65
Amber Thompson
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 4
3.60
Joanna Heiden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.60
Regina Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.56
Pamela Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Julie Labrum
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Tiffany Renfro
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Warren + Stacie Johnson6066% games+16.1% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Kristi Warren8160% games+12.5% vs expected
AMANDA NEFF + Pamela Roberts5167% games+10.5% vs expected
Julie Labrum + Crystel Fox4360% games+9.7% vs expected
Joanna Heiden + Anji DowDell5458% games+8.1% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Alyson Ellis10458% games+7.0% vs expected
Anji DowDell + Kristi Warren4162% games+6.6% vs expected
Julie Labrum + Robyn Scharman9357% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Park
104W–40L career · 24 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
Stacie Johnson
102W–85L career · 14 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Alyson Ellis
179W–48L career · 17 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Crystel Fox
151W–134L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.81
Kristi Warren
242W–134L career · 16 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
AMANDA NEFF
54W–44L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Anji DowDell
99W–77L career · 19 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amber Thompson
128W–106L career · 10 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · 9 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Regina Johnson
124W–102L career · 21 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Pamela Roberts
99W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Julie Labrum
102W–99L career · 18 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.