Teams

LCTA40/Jones/MPR

2022 USTA 40 & Over Spring · 40 & over Women - 4.0 Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & over Women - 4.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
3.71
Holly Balcer
published 4
3.68
3.64
Debra Mulholland
published 4
3.59
Suzanne Stebbins
published
3.52
Susy Teale
published
3.51
Susan Carpenter
published
3.43
Tatsiana Beiko
published
3.38
Helen Elliott
published 3.5
3.25
Christiane Jones
published 3.5
3.22
Jane Fluet
published
3.05
Gloria Prindle
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Carpenter + Suzanne Stebbins4647% games−1.3% vs expected
Jacqueline Cocchiola + Susan Carpenter91251% games−7.2% vs expected
Jane Fluet + Christiane Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Prindle + Christiane Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Debra Mulholland + Susan Carpenter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Cocchiola
34W–30L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Holly Balcer
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Charlene Magnuson
60W–54L career · type A · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Mulholland
69W–65L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Suzanne Stebbins
21W–27L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Susy Teale
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Susan Carpenter
29W–38L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Tatsiana Beiko
29W–92L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Helen Elliott
15W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Christiane Jones
97W–139L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jane Fluet
39W–50L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Gloria Prindle
29W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.