Teams

JMorse/JClayton (Queens)

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-30vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Kuykendal / Nathan Woods vs Logan Wilson / Steven Marks2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCole Cannon / Jason Kohler vs David Shevsky / Adam Webb0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Morse / Ryan Morse vs William John McGough Jr. / Kenneth Godfrey6-4, 5-2
2025-07-23vs BLucio/HZhang (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHolden Sawyer / Rahul Ramkumar vs Myles Bell / Baiying Hu5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick McCardle / John Clayton vs Brandon Lucio / Mingyi Yin6-4, 6-1
2025-07-16vs NLarsen (Jeff Adams)Won 21
L#1 DoublesRahul Ramkumar / Nathan Woods vs Grant Cretin / Grant Reuter0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick McCardle / John Clayton vs Nick Larsen / Parik Naresh6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCole Cannon / Walter Wingard vs Zach Mason / Robert Roe6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-09vs JChung (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRahul Ramkumar / Holden Sawyer vs Oren Golanski / Gustavo Teixeira0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Clayton / Jason Kohler vs Steven Inga / Kevin Ferreira2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCole Cannon / Ryan Morse vs Leon Banchik / Sharath Budipalli6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-02vs BHarrell (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRahul Ramkumar / Jason Kohler vs George Pawlush / Lawrence Jinks3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Woods / Patrick McCardle vs Brett Harrell / Nicholas LeCroy1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesWalter Wingard / Cole Cannon vs Eric Bostic / Bruce Gibson1-6, 3-6
2025-06-25vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Kuykendal / Nathan Woods vs Steven Marks / Singh B Dhillon6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatrick McCardle / Jason Kohler vs David Shevsky / Adam Webb0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Morse / Walter Wingard vs Joseph Garner / Kris Chapman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs BLucio/HZhang (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 DoublesNathan Woods / Rahul Ramkumar vs Tiger Zhang / Baiying Hu4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick McCardle / John Clayton vs Jared Kleber / Brandon Lucio6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Morse / Walter Wingard vs Mingyi Yin / James Jerrell6-2, 7-5
2025-06-11vs NLarsen (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick McCardle / Rahul Ramkumar vs Grant Reuter / Nick Larsen4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHolden Sawyer / Walter Wingard vs Zach Mason / Robert Roe6-2, 6-2
2025-06-04vs JChung (Life Time)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Clayton / Patrick McCardle vs Gustavo Teixeira / Joseph Cochran7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNathan Woods / Holden Sawyer vs David Greer / Maksym Mikhart3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCole Cannon / Walter Wingard vs Leon Banchik / Richard Williamson0-6, 3-6
2025-05-28vs BHarrell (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRahul Ramkumar / Jeffrey Kuykendal vs Patrick Murchison / Lawrence Jinks0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Clayton / Holden Sawyer vs Brett Harrell / Daniel Kolepp0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Morse / Cole Cannon vs Eric Ovendorf / Jonathan Spensieri3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jeffrey Kuykendal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
John Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.26
Nathan Woods
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Ryan Morse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Holden Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Rahul Ramkumar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Jeff Morse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Walter Wingard
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Cole Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Patrick McCardle
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick McCardle + John Clayton4156% games+12.0% vs expected
John Clayton + Ryan Morse224 matchesnot enough data
Patrick McCardle + Ryan Morse303 matchesnot enough data
Cole Cannon + Walter Wingard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeffrey Kuykendal
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
John Clayton
40W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Nathan Woods
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Ryan Morse
21W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Holden Sawyer
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Rahul Ramkumar
3W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jeff Morse
20W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Walter Wingard
5W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Cole Cannon
3W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick McCardle
12W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.