Teams

BLucio/HZhang (Park Road)

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesJared Kleber / James Jerrell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-23vs JMorse/JClayton (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lucio / Mingyi Yin vs Patrick McCardle / John Clayton4-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs BHarrell (WSRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lucio / Will Lewis III vs Nicholas LeCroy / Brett Harrell4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMingyi Yin / James Jerrell vs Jonathan Spensieri / Russell Hughes2-6, 6-7
2025-07-16vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lucio / Will Lewis III vs Eric Weinbrenner / Jeremy Rhoten7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMingyi Yin / James Jerrell vs Joseph Garner / Kenneth Godfrey0-6, 3-6
2025-07-02vs NLarsen (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#2 DoublesTiger Zhang / Will Lewis III vs Derek Farmer / Grant Reuter6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJames Jerrell / Jared Kleber vs Nick Larsen / Robert Roe6-4, 6-1
2025-07-01vs JChung (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lucio / Will Lewis III vs David Greer / Kevin Ferreira7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJared Kleber / James Jerrell vs Leon Banchik / Richard Williamson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-18vs JMorse/JClayton (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJared Kleber / Brandon Lucio vs Patrick McCardle / John Clayton7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMingyi Yin / James Jerrell vs Ryan Morse / Walter Wingard2-6, 5-7
2025-06-11vs EWeinbrenner (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lucio / Will Lewis III vs Singh B Dhillon / Jeremy Rhoten3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMingyi Yin / James Jerrell vs Kris Chapman / Kenneth Godfrey1-6, 4-6
2025-06-04vs BHarrell (WSRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesBrandon Lucio / Will Lewis III vs Brett Harrell / Nicholas LeCroy4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJames Jerrell / Mingyi Yin vs Russell Hughes / Bruce Gibson6-4, 6-4
2025-05-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMingyi Yin / James Jerrell vs Grant Cretin / Robert Roe6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Baiying Hu
published 4
3.52
Tiger Zhang
published
3.47
Brandon Lucio
published 3.5
3.36
Myles Bell
published
3.18
Will Lewis III
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Jared Kleber
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Mingyi Yin
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Baiying Hu
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Tiger Zhang
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Brandon Lucio
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Myles Bell
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
Will Lewis III
37W–85L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Jared Kleber
34W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Mingyi Yin
26W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.