Teams

Wangstas

2025 Montgomery Combo Mixed · Montgomery Combo Mixed 8.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.39 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-11vs wang - MaybachLost 12
L#1 DoublesLiz Christensen / Luis Lozano vs Changfu Xiao / Dian Zhang6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCassandra Price / Johnny Hsiung vs Qi Hua / Caitlin Lee1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaitlyn Heo / Ji Cha vs Hong Hu / Yiziying Chen6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-12-01vs McInerney - Your Pace or Mine 25Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Dean / Johnny Hsiung vs Ryan Cinoman / Stephanie Pitts2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLuis Lozano / Kanika Sabor vs David Nazari / Jenna Gietl6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaith Layous / Lucy Wang vs Alina Limpert / Brian Bichy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs wang - MaybachSplit 11
L#1 DoublesByron Levy / Chanpen Teeranon vs Koby Bonta / Jin Lei2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesThomas Cyrnak / Jessica Lee vs Joy Wu / Zeyu Zhang6-1, 6-3
2025-11-15vs wang - MaybachLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaith Layous / Lucy Wang vs Jin Lei / Koby Bonta6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaitlyn Heo / Ji Cha vs Richard Wang / Irene Chen6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Lee / Thomas Cyrnak vs Ye Hu / Zeyu Zhang4-6, 5-7
2025-11-12vs wang - MaybachWon 20
W#2 DoublesLiz Christensen / Luis Lozano vs Ye Hu / Zeyu Zhang6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Cyrnak / Kanika Sabor vs Richard Wang / Joy Wu6-3, 6-3
2025-10-27vs McInerney - Your Pace or Mine 25Won 21
L#1 DoublesByron Levy / Chanpen Teeranon vs Brian Bichy / Stephanie Pitts2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaith Layous / Lucy Wang vs Jenna Gietl / David Nazari6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJi Cha / Kaitlyn Heo vs Ryan Cinoman / Laura McInerney6-1, 6-4
2025-10-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Cyrnak / Jessica Lee vs Richard Wang / Irene Chen6-7, 4-6
2025-10-19vs McInerney - Your Pace or Mine 25Split 11
W#1 DoublesByron Levy / Chanpen Teeranon vs Laura McInerney / Ian Lucas6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeonard Tetteh / Lucy Wang vs Jenna Gietl / Renaldo Savady2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Angel Batkins
published 5
4.68
Kaitlyn Heo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.53
Thomas Cyrnak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.39
Luis Lozano
published
4.36
Cassandra Price
published 4.5
4.33
Laith Layous
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Leonard Tetteh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Kanika Sabor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Byron Levy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
Pamela Dean
published
4.10
Liz Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Bo Gao
published 4
3.95
Johnny Hsiung
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.81
Ji Cha
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christopher Lee
published 4
3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Sawyer Warren
published
Hayan Marouf
published
Jessica Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaitlyn Heo + Ji Cha13853% games−4.5% vs expected
Byron Levy + Chanpen Teeranon3937% games−5.6% vs expected
Thomas Cyrnak + Sawyer Warren404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Kaitlyn Heo
128W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
4.5
Thomas Cyrnak
311W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.53
Luis Lozano
67W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Cassandra Price
6W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Laith Layous
175W–114L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
4.33
4.5
Leonard Tetteh
336W–208L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Kanika Sabor
128W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Byron Levy
144W–118L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Pamela Dean
40W–38L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Liz Christensen
123W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Bo Gao
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Johnny Hsiung
573W–156L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lucy Wang
34W–15L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Ji Cha
70W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Christopher Lee
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Sawyer Warren
24W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Hayan Marouf
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.