← Teams

Team 8 Herding Cats

2022 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-02-25vs Team 5 MidCourt CrisisLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Deanne Iverson vs Kenneth Fowler / Diana Britell3-6, 3-6
2022-02-19Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Butler / Deanne Iverson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesTommy Hyres / Deanne Iverson vs Eduardo Castro / Jang Han6-0, 6-2
2022-02-05vs Team 6 AMU 2.0Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDeanne Iverson / Duncan Sweny vs Juan Jose Tijero / Erica Smedberg3-6, 1-6
2022-01-31vs Team 7 Racquet ScientistsWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Schafer / Tommy Hyres vs Jann Cassady / Charles Robinett6-1, 6-1
2022-01-29vs Team 2Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Ashley Furman vs Sharon Sabasteanski / ERIC Levine6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesArturo Garcia Alonso / Carolyn Schafer vs Moe Haidar / Leah Sedwick6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-01-23vs Team 4 Smart AcesLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesArturo Garcia Alonso / Debbie Wilson vs Joseph Jacangelo / Taylor Marr2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Natalia Hozdevila vs Terry Saeger / Kristi Nault2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-01-14vs Team 3 Volley RanchersSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Ashley Furman vs Paul Bouwmeester / Sissel Bakken3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Flam / Deanne Iverson vs Nathan Bergman / Alison Bouwmeester6-1, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Devarshi Bhatt
published 4
3.61
Ivan Kozliak
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
Nick Mariotti
published —
3.45
Deanne Iverson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Tommy Hyres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Arturo Garcia Alonso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
3.01
David Flam
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanne Iverson + Tommy Hyres2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Devarshi Bhatt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–288L career · 7 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
—
Nick Mariotti
63W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Deanne Iverson
165W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Tommy Hyres
59W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Arturo Garcia Alonso
77W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3.5
David Flam
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.