Teams

Sports Mall-Adams/DowDell

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.94 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-DaySplit 11
W#1 SinglesGrace Anthony vs Jennifer Sampson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLindie Hoggan / Natalie Watts vs Alexandra Spruill / Claire McNulty4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesGrace Anthony vs Jamie Harris6-3, 6-0
2023-05-16Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnji DowDell / Brooklyn DowDell vs Teri Bishop / Julie Jones2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGrace Anthony vs Kathryn Tagge6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-09Split 11
L#1 DoublesGrace Anthony / Jennifer Rasmussen vs Adrienne Davis / Olivia Hu1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Natalie Watts vs Aimee Nilson / Janice Stokes-Burns2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-18vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 12
L#1 SinglesGrace Anthony vs Sherilyn Rawlings7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBrooklyn DowDell vs Lauren Rawlings6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindie Hoggan / Natalie Watts vs Valerie Blackhurst / Pam Ollivier5-7, 3-6
2023-04-11vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnji DowDell / Brooklyn DowDell vs Laura Williams / Lisa Hakes6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Stacie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.93
Alyson Ellis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.77
Robyn Scharman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Anji DowDell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Brooklyn DowDell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Grace Anthony
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.61
Joanna Heiden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.60
Jennifer Rasmussen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Annalyn Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.40
Natalie Watts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Lindie Hoggan
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.36
Michelle Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.33
Nicole Reese
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Julie Labrum
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.16
Tiffany Renfro
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Lexie Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Labrum + Robyn Scharman7358% games+8.5% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Alyson Ellis10458% games+7.5% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Michelle Edwards4649% games+6.9% vs expected
Nicole Reese + Michelle Edwards512956% games+4.7% vs expected
Lindie Hoggan + Anji DowDell5356% games+4.0% vs expected
Annalyn Adams + Lindie Hoggan10453% games+3.2% vs expected
Anji DowDell + Alyson Ellis6361% games+3.0% vs expected
Julie Labrum + Joanna Heiden5349% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacie Johnson
99W–80L career · 7 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Alyson Ellis
173W–47L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Anji DowDell
95W–74L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Brooklyn DowDell
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Grace Anthony
25W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · 9 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jennifer Rasmussen
43W–77L career · 8 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Annalyn Adams
122W–97L career · 10 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Natalie Watts
41W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.40
Lindie Hoggan
58W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.39
Michelle Edwards
94W–63L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Nicole Reese
103W–62L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Julie Labrum
98W–95L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 7 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Lexie Williams
20W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.