Teams

Rackettes

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-19vs Qualifying Team 6.0 WWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Bean / Cathy Lower vs Patrisha Crisp / Rebecca Jasmine6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDawn Schwartz / Sheila Schaub vs Nancy Larson / Cynthia Ford6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSandrah MacK / Elaine Scott vs Mardi Robers / Becky Wilcox7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-18vs Qualifying Team 6.0 WWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Lower / Judy Klein vs Patrisha Crisp / Nancy Larson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Bean / Sandrah MacK vs Rebecca Jasmine / Becky Wilcox7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSheila Schaub / Dawn Schwartz vs Mary Dill / Mardi Robers6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-17vs Qualifying Team 6.0 WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJudy Klein / Sheila Schaub vs Rebecca Jasmine / Mary Dill3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Schwartz / Kathleen Bean vs Nancy Larson / Cynthia Ford6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Lower / Elaine Scott vs Mardi Robers / Patrisha Crisp6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rackettes3072681
2Qualifying Team 6.0 W032716104

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Judy Klein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Dawn Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Cathy Lower
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Elaine Scott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Kathleen Bean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sandrah MacK
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sheila Schaub
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandrah MacK + Judy Klein3355% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Scott + Cathy Lower3252% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Schwartz + Sheila Schaub123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Bean + Sandrah MacK213 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Schaub + Judy Klein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Judy Klein
32W–27L career · 6 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Dawn Schwartz
7W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Cathy Lower
12W–8L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Elaine Scott
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Bean
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandrah MacK
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sheila Schaub
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.