Teams

Qualifying Team 6.0 W

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-19vs RackettesLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrisha Crisp / Rebecca Jasmine vs Kathleen Bean / Cathy Lower1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Larson / Cynthia Ford vs Dawn Schwartz / Sheila Schaub3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMardi Robers / Becky Wilcox vs Sandrah MacK / Elaine Scott6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-06-18vs RackettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrisha Crisp / Nancy Larson vs Cathy Lower / Judy Klein3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Jasmine / Becky Wilcox vs Kathleen Bean / Sandrah MacK6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Dill / Mardi Robers vs Sheila Schaub / Dawn Schwartz7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-17vs RackettesLost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Jasmine / Mary Dill vs Judy Klein / Sheila Schaub6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Larson / Cynthia Ford vs Dawn Schwartz / Kathleen Bean4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMardi Robers / Patrisha Crisp vs Cathy Lower / Elaine Scott4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rackettes3072681
2Qualifying Team 6.0 W032716104

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Becky Wilcox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.49
Cynthia Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Patrisha Crisp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Kathleen Bean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mardi Robers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Dill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Rebecca Jasmine
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mardi Robers + Becky Wilcox3445% gamesnot enough data
Patrisha Crisp + Nancy Larson044 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Bean + Patrisha Crisp123 matchesnot enough data
Mardi Robers + Cynthia Ford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Wilcox
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Cynthia Ford
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Patrisha Crisp
14W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%54%46%
2.49
Kathleen Bean
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mardi Robers
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Dill
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Larson
0W–13L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
12W–6L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.