Teams

BROADSTONE RC 18AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Darui Jiang
published 4
3.62
Amandeep Kaur
published 4
3.60
Linda Mcclain
published
3.55
Stacey Matteoli
published
3.52
Elaine Yap
published
3.51
Karin Shelton
published
3.35
3.33
Leanne Weaver
published
3.25
Christina Charn
published 3.5
3.21
Sandi Ammons
published
3.18
Denise Chisick
published 3.5
3.16
Jeanne Ferrell
published
3.14
Betty Williams
published 3.5
3.07
Teresa Schmutte
published
3.01
Carolyn Soriano
published 3.5
2.91
Jeannine Neves
published
Larisa Johnson-Tong
published
Theresa Lo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Mcclain + Elaine Yap12757% games+5.1% vs expected
Jeanne Ferrell + Elaine Yap224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Ferrell + Sandi Ammons213 matchesnot enough data
Amandeep Kaur + Karin Shelton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darui Jiang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Amandeep Kaur
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.62
Linda Mcclain
33W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
Stacey Matteoli
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Elaine Yap
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Karin Shelton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Kirsten Wilson-Trowbridge
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
Leanne Weaver
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Christina Charn
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Sandi Ammons
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Denise Chisick
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jeanne Ferrell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Betty Williams
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Teresa Schmutte
17W–25L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carolyn Soriano
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jeannine Neves
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
Larisa Johnson-Tong
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Lo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.