Teams

WASHINGTON PK 40AW4.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-17vs PLEASANTON 40AW4.0BLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Ann Haslup / Robyn Schleifman vs Margie Moran / Caroline Hauck3-6, 1-6
2024-03-09vs LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesRobyn Schleifman / Elizabeth Ann Haslup vs Pearl Leung / Liz Medalle1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Martha Matrisian
published
3.77
Garbo Berger
published 4
3.74
Debbie Soleta
published 4
3.72
Zhen Zhang
published
3.56
Juliana Kresse
published
3.54
Kimberly Caison
published
3.50
Ning Docena
published
3.44
Helen Yang
published 3.5
3.43
Gina Chen
published 4
3.43
Robyn Schleifman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Minh Cannon
published
3.31
Nancy Daetz
published
3.30
Susan Weeks
published
3.22
Rochelle Rich
published
3.18
Kristin Fairfield
published
3.15
Renee Mercier
published
2.88
Jessica Zhang
published
Jessie Du
published
Myra Auer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Daetz + Rochelle Rich1443% games−0.3% vs expected
Robyn Schleifman + Kristin Fairfield2340% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Matrisian
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Garbo Berger
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debbie Soleta
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Zhen Zhang
15W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Juliana Kresse
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kimberly Caison
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.54
Ning Docena
13W–26L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Helen Yang
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
4
Gina Chen
27W–19L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Robyn Schleifman
169W–123L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Nancy Daetz
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Susan Weeks
25W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Ann Haslup
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rochelle Rich
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Kristin Fairfield
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Renee Mercier
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jessica Zhang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
2.88
Jessie Du
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Myra Auer
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.