Teams

IRMSL/Whittington/50&over6.5W

2024 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-07vs Buttonwood-WernickLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Pribble / Kathy Galla vs Janis Parker / Sandra Chapin7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTiffany George / Charlotte Biggs vs Angela Wernick / Eileen Cusumano6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Whittington / Maureen Holley vs Laurie Sciscente / Elizabeth Friday-Skoda6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-16vs COMBO Jam VC - EnevoldsenWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrigite Babine / Maureen Holley vs Andrea Geldres / Frances Henig6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Biggs / Tiffany George vs Barbara Lanni / Jennifer Cancio6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Whittington / Robin Schalz vs Elena Barbosa / Mary Rosendahl6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-10vs NRS - MoffatWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Pribble / Kathleen Rowling vs Kathy Goers / Darla Cederberg3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany George / Charlotte Biggs vs Julie Thyrring / Cynthia Wicker6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Horvit / Maureen Holley vs Joy Muller / Jane Moffat6-0, 6-4
2024-11-09vs Buttonwood-WernickWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrigite Babine / Maureen Holley vs SHERRY SKINNER / Laurie Sciscente6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Horvit / Anna Sorrentino vs Gillian Boice / Janis Parker3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Whittington / Robin Schalz vs Eileen Cusumano / Elizabeth Friday-Skoda7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-19vs COMBO Jam VC - EnevoldsenWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaureen Holley / Susan Yeager vs Andrea Geldres / Frances Henig3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Pribble / Kathleen Rowling vs Marie Woodhull / Joan Dobravsky5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Galla / Anna Sorrentino vs Barbara Lanni / Elizabeth Beirne6-4, 6-1
2024-10-12vs Buttonwood-WernickWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoyce Costopoulos / Robin Schalz vs Gillian Boice / Angela Wernick4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Yeager / Maureen Holley vs SHERRY SKINNER / Elizabeth Friday-Skoda6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Pribble / Kathleen Rowling vs Nancy Lewandowski / Deana Newson6-2, 6-4
2024-10-05vs NRS - MoffatWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoyce Costopoulos / Kathy Galla vs Darla Cederberg / Julie Thyrring7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaureen Holley / Nancy Pribble vs Jane Moffat / Joy Muller6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrigite Babine / Anna Sorrentino vs Kathy Goers / Elaine Byrket2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Brigite Babine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Anna Sorrentino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charlotte Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joyce Costopoulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Rowling
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Galla
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marilyn Horvit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maureen Holley
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Nancy Pribble
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Robin Schalz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Whittington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Yeager
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tiffany George
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Costopoulos + Kathy Galla314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Yeager + Maureen Holley213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Whittington + Brigite Babine213 matchesnot enough data
Charlotte Biggs + Tiffany George213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pribble + Kathleen Rowling213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brigite Babine
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Anna Sorrentino
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Charlotte Biggs
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joyce Costopoulos
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Rowling
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Galla
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Horvit
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Holley
19W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Pribble
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Schalz
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Whittington
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Yeager
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tiffany George
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.