Teams

COMBO Jam VC - Enevoldsen

2024 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-07vs NRS - MoffatWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrances Henig / Andrea Geldres vs Darla Cederberg / Kelly Perelli-Minetti6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Kalish / Pamela S Jones vs Cynthia Wicker / Kathy Goers2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElena Barbosa / Jennelle Enevoldsen vs Jane Moffat / Dianne Chandler6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-23vs Buttonwood-WernickLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Woodhull / Eileen Grossfeld vs Eileen Cusumano / Laurie Sciscente3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Lanni / Joan Dobravsky vs Sandra Chapin / Elizabeth Friday-Skoda5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPamela S Jones / Jennifer Cancio vs Angela Wernick / Deana Newson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs IRMSL/Whittington/50&over6.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Geldres / Frances Henig vs Brigite Babine / Maureen Holley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Lanni / Jennifer Cancio vs Charlotte Biggs / Tiffany George3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElena Barbosa / Mary Rosendahl vs Susan Whittington / Robin Schalz1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-02vs NRS - MoffatLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Geldres / Frances Henig vs Jane Moffat / Kathy Goers7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Woodhull / Joan Dobravsky vs Elaine Byrket / Dianne Chandler3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElena Barbosa / Elizabeth Beirne vs Cynthia Wicker / Julie Thyrring6-7, 4-6
2024-10-19vs IRMSL/Whittington/50&over6.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Geldres / Frances Henig vs Maureen Holley / Susan Yeager6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarie Woodhull / Joan Dobravsky vs Nancy Pribble / Kathleen Rowling7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Lanni / Elizabeth Beirne vs Kathy Galla / Anna Sorrentino4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Catherine Kumar
published 3.5
3.38
Andrea Geldres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Lanni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Jennifer Cancio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Elizabeth Beirne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Beth Kalish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Joan Dobravsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Eileen Grossfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elena Barbosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Frances Henig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennelle Enevoldsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Woodhull
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Rosendahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela S Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Beirne + Beth Kalish5252% games+3.2% vs expected
Andrea Geldres + Frances Henig224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Beirne + Joan Dobravsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Kumar
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Andrea Geldres
12W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Barbara Lanni
1W–3L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Cancio
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
Elizabeth Beirne
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Beth Kalish
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92
Joan Dobravsky
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Eileen Grossfeld
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Elena Barbosa
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Frances Henig
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennelle Enevoldsen
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marie Woodhull
1W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Rosendahl
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Pamela S Jones
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.