Teams

A:LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteo

2023 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-01-22vs A:GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransLost 04
L#1 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Camille Burlingham vs Sarah Sandora / Lisa MacKay2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMartha Gibson vs Marissa Capasso2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Belliveau / Josie Jordan vs Kristen Rosecrans / Averi Cappetta5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKim de Matteo / Beth Pye vs Kate Piironen / Lori Moroso0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Belliveau / Camille Burlingham vs Patricia Goldfeder / Jacqui Mullally6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBeth Pye vs Michelle Belcourt1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSherri Storms / Anne Luner vs Jennifer Brant / Meghan Farmer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKim de Matteo / Sheryl Ash vs Ilona Marsh / Barbara Doran1-6, 2-6
2022-12-10vs A:MIS:3.5:Frickman/ColemanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCamille Burlingham / Lisa Belliveau vs Andrea Frickman / Hally Schoen7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Kupka vs Amy Searle2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim de Matteo / Connie Hurtt vs Mia Nolan / Sarah Steverman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSheryl Ash / Michele Hootstein vs Ding Ding / Lisa Marie Coleman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-12-03vs B:NHH:Fireballs:GershfeldLost 13
L#1 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Michele Hootstein vs Martha Royston / Susan Griffiths6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKeelin Hurtt vs Liz van Leer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Pye / Josie Jordan vs Carol Evans / Rita King3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Luner / Sherri Storms vs Lillian Garcia / Dorothy Mancini6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Jennifer Wilson vs MaryBeth Giles / Valerie Libert6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKeelin Hurtt vs Heather Bancroft-Hunt6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Belliveau / Anne Luner vs Eileen Duggan / Ann Wright6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBeth Pye / Jessica Kupka vs Grace Degrooth / Leslie Gourlay4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJessica Kirwan / Beth Pye vs Diana Beilin / Laura King6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Hootstein / Connie Hurtt vs Betty Orban / Jamie Stasko6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim de Matteo / Anne Luner vs Jean Bacon / Monica Slowik6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-05vs A:GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Kirwan / Jennifer Wilson vs Debbie Kelly / Leslie Palumbo6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKim de Matteo / Josie Jordan vs Maureen Goodrich / Deborah Montenegro1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSheryl Ash / Martha Gibson vs Debra Musto / Toni Rivera4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLisa Belliveau / Jessica Kirwan vs Carolyn Caldwell / Philippa Mannino6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnne Luner vs Agnieszka Robinson6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Jennifer Wilson vs Nancy Eastwood / Nancy Schumann7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-15vs A:MIS:3.5:Frickman/ColemanLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Belliveau / Jennifer Wilson vs Andrea Frickman / Sarah Steverman1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKeelin Hurtt vs Ding Ding4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Anne Luner vs Kathy Calnen / Mia Nolan6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJosie Jordan / Beth Pye vs Lisa Marie Coleman / Margery Raho2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLisa Belliveau / Jessica Kirwan vs Eileen Duggan / Grace Degrooth6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJessica Kupka vs Ann Whitall6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kenyon / Michele Hootstein vs Heather Bancroft-Hunt / Meghan Trausch6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim de Matteo / Anne Luner vs Cathleen Carroll / Leslie Gourlay6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1B:MIL:Mid-Court Crisis:Orban/Reyes-Matos010241536327
2A:GF:Namaste at the Net:Rosecrans010251537321
3B:MAD:Madrackets 3.5L:Goldfeder/Palmer010251538344
4B:OSB:Prosecco Girls:Coffey/Costello010211742380
5A:MIS:3.5:Frickman/Coleman010202044340
6B:NHH:Fireballs:Gershfeld010192147342
7A:LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteo010172354392
8A:OSB:Causing A Racket:Trausch/Trausch01073269440

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Kathleen Kenyon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Lisa Belliveau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Connie Hurtt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.32
Camille Burlingham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Anne Luner
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.06
Beth Pye
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.90
Kim de Matteo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Jessica Kupka
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
2.70
Martha Gibson
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Josie Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Sherri Storms
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jessica Kirwan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Keelin Hurtt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Michele Hootstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sheryl Ash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Kirwan + Lisa Belliveau10066% games+12.3% vs expected
Camille Burlingham + Lisa Belliveau24761% games+11.5% vs expected
Connie Hurtt + Camille Burlingham3453% games+5.5% vs expected
Beth Pye + Anne Luner6354% games−3.0% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Kim de Matteo4547% games−4.4% vs expected
Anne Luner + Kim de Matteo6850% games−4.6% vs expected
Connie Hurtt + Lisa Belliveau9848% games−4.6% vs expected
Beth Pye + Josie Jordan41241% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Kenyon
41W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lisa Belliveau
131W–109L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Connie Hurtt
143W–125L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Camille Burlingham
77W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Anne Luner
57W–44L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Beth Pye
42W–52L career · 6 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kim de Matteo
55W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.90
Jessica Kupka
29W–43L career · 13 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Martha Gibson
101W–114L career · 9 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Josie Jordan
32W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Sherri Storms
31W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jessica Kirwan
48W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Keelin Hurtt
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Hootstein
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheryl Ash
32W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.