Teams

A:MIS:3.5:Frickman/Coleman

2023 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Sarah Steverman vs Eileen Duggan / Valerie Libert6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStephanie Marchand vs Ann Whitall6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHally Schoen / Kathy Calnen vs Ann Wright / Heather Bancroft-Hunt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Margery Raho vs Virginia Jordan / Cathleen Carroll6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesHally Schoen / Sarah Steverman vs Diana Beilin / Amelia Chivetta4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Marchand vs Stefanie Kreiger6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMia Nolan / Lisa Marie Coleman vs Laura King / Christina Ruenhorst2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Cosgriff / Margery Raho vs Betty Orban / Jennifer Myatt4-6, 0-6
2022-12-10vs A:LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Hally Schoen vs Camille Burlingham / Lisa Belliveau5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Jessica Kupka6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMia Nolan / Sarah Steverman vs Kim de Matteo / Connie Hurtt6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDing Ding / Lisa Marie Coleman vs Sheryl Ash / Michele Hootstein3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-12-04vs B:OSB:Prosecco Girls:Coffey/CostelloSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Sarah Steverman vs Rebecca Coffey / Philippa Mannino6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Agnieszka Robinson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMia Nolan / Amy Searle vs Anne Hefter / Cherie Anderson-Mucha6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Kathy Calnen vs Mary Ann Moran / Siobhan McAndrews6-7, 3-6
2022-11-19vs A:GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransLost 13
W#1 DoublesDonna Sullivan / Andrea Frickman vs Sarah Sandora / Melissa Ginz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKathy Calnen vs Jill Fried1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Lauri Burke vs Kristen Rosecrans / Lisa MacKay2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargery Raho / Eileen Cosgriff vs Debra Musto / Laura LaCascia-Ehlert0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Marchand / Mia Nolan vs Barbara Doran / Alison Randall3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Michelle Belcourt3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Searle / Kathy Calnen vs Jennifer Brant / Meghan Farmer3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Eileen Cosgriff vs Kathleen Speer / Diane Hills4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesEmily Hayes / Mia Nolan vs Eileen Duggan / Grace Degrooth6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Meghan Trausch6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLauri Burke / Eileen Cosgriff vs Paula Passarello / Ann Wright4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Kathy Calnen vs Cathleen Carroll / Leslie Gourlay6-1, 6-4
2022-10-29vs B:NHH:Fireballs:GershfeldLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Hayes / Andrea Frickman vs Marie Crane / Susan Griffiths6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Emily Ryder3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLauri Burke / Kathy Calnen vs Carol Evans / Shelley Marcus3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEileen Cosgriff / Margery Raho vs Heidi Brooks / Dorothy Mancini3-6, 3-6
2022-10-15vs A:LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteoWon 40
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Sarah Steverman vs Lisa Belliveau / Jennifer Wilson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Keelin Hurtt6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Calnen / Mia Nolan vs Connie Hurtt / Anne Luner3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Margery Raho vs Josie Jordan / Beth Pye6-2, 6-3
2022-09-24vs A:GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Donna Sullivan vs Eleanor Tandler / Lisa MacKay6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Maureen Goodrich2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Hayes / Mia Nolan vs Debbie Kelly / Laura LaCascia-Ehlert6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Marie Coleman / Lauri Burke vs Jill Boffa / MAGDALENA CAPASSO4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1B:MIL:Mid-Court Crisis:Orban/Reyes-Matos010241536327
2A:GF:Namaste at the Net:Rosecrans010251537321
3B:MAD:Madrackets 3.5L:Goldfeder/Palmer010251538344
4B:OSB:Prosecco Girls:Coffey/Costello010211742380
5A:MIS:3.5:Frickman/Coleman010202044340
6B:NHH:Fireballs:Gershfeld010192147342
7A:LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteo010172354392
8A:OSB:Causing A Racket:Trausch/Trausch01073269440

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Andrea Frickman
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.64
Stephanie Marchand
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.21
Amy Searle
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.18
Ding Ding
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Sarah Steverman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.14
Eileen Cosgriff
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Kathy Calnen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.97
Mia Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Amy Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Lauri Burke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Donna Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hally Schoen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Margery Raho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Baumann + Eileen Cosgriff9259% games+10.0% vs expected
Lauri Burke + Eileen Cosgriff8456% games+5.1% vs expected
Mia Nolan + Sarah Steverman4161% games+5.1% vs expected
Mia Nolan + Eileen Cosgriff1640% games+2.3% vs expected
Eileen Cosgriff + Kathy Calnen5645% games+1.5% vs expected
Lauri Burke + Kathy Calnen2344% games+0.6% vs expected
Margery Raho + Eileen Cosgriff3444% games−7.6% vs expected
Mia Nolan + Kathy Calnen1539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Frickman
114W–61L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Stephanie Marchand
47W–66L career · 9 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Amy Searle
83W–108L career · 11 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Ding Ding
27W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Sarah Steverman
30W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Eileen Cosgriff
41W–52L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Kathy Calnen
18W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.03
Mia Nolan
25W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Amy Baumann
91W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Lauri Burke
82W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Donna Sullivan
13W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Hally Schoen
31W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Margery Raho
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.