Teams

We're Tennis Friends

2022 DC WTA Combo Mixed · DC WTA Combo Mixed 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-10vs Sunmin's PatisserieLost 01
L#1 DoublesCurtis Derek Owens / Tia Briscoe vs Benjamin Owsley / Mae Lin0-6, 1-6
2022-09-07vs Anderson & AndersonLost 01
L#2 DoublesCurtis Derek Owens / Tia Briscoe vs Frederic Colas / Layna Kelly5-7, 3-6
2022-08-27vs Mixed MastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesArchella Dorsey / Amir Mousavi vs Della Cummings / Jake Satisky1-6, 2-6
2022-08-21vs Game TimeLost 01
L#2 DoublesCurtis Derek Owens / Archella Dorsey vs Abdoul Miloud Agbere / Josephine Bakari3-6, 3-6
2022-08-07vs Sunmin's PatisserieSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTia Briscoe / Asa Elkins vs Sunmin Kim / Benjamin Owsley7-5, 1-2
L#3 DoublesMyra Outlaw / Shango Kwame vs ALBERT TENG / Kirah Yen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
3.60
Tia Briscoe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Shango Kwame
published
3.28
Myra Outlaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Asa Elkins
published 3.5
3.10
Sandra Peterson
published
3.09
Kimberly White
published
3.02
REGINA DAVIS
published
2.82
Archella Dorsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Rachel Feichter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Peterson + Asa Elkins1739% games−6.9% vs expected
Shango Kwame + Myra Outlaw5450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Curtis Derek Owens
24W–32L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Tia Briscoe
286W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Shango Kwame
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Myra Outlaw
76W–106L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Asa Elkins
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Sandra Peterson
37W–68L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kimberly White
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
REGINA DAVIS
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Archella Dorsey
114W–147L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Rachel Feichter
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.