Teams

LOCH.Graff

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-09vs MVL.HariharanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArthur Gloer / Trevor Hoyles vs Syam Siripurapu / Santosh Voruganti3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNathan Naramor / Bob Cwikla vs Chandan Kumar / Neelakantam Jarugumalli2-6, 2-6
2022-09-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAdam Schwartz / Daryn Watson vs Michael Littlefield / Tom Qian0-6, 6-7
2022-09-11vs MD.RiddickSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPaul Bridgers / Arthur Gloer vs Christopher Frederick / Todd Sninski6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaryn Watson / Bob Cwikla vs Cullen Lee / Alex Withers6-4, 6-3
2022-08-29vs TOC.DesuWon 10
W#3 DoublesDan Robinson / Bob Cwikla vs Sanjeev Dimri / Guri Burmi6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-28vs TOC.StognerLost 01
L#2 DoublesDan Robinson / Bob Cwikla vs Mark Baldwin / Ronald Stogner5-7, 2-6
2022-08-14vs MVL.HariharanLost 01
L#2 DoublesArthur Gloer / Gustavo Abrantes vs Pawan Kumar / Chandan Kumar0-6, 1-6
2022-08-07vs TOC.HolstonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesArthur Gloer / Adam Schwartz vs Mohammed Dessouky / Chip Pope1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDaryn Watson / Bob Cwikla vs Matthew Feldt / Steve Pigora6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Dan Robinson
published 3.5
3.18
Trevor Hoyles
published
3.11
Daryn Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Gustavo Abrantes
published 3
3.06
Nathan Naramor
published
2.93
Arthur Gloer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.84
Bob Cwikla
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Adam Schwartz
published 3
2.69
Kenneth Waters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daryn Watson + Bob Cwikla2442% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Waters + Arthur Gloer123 matchesnot enough data
Arthur Gloer + Bob Cwikla123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Robinson
12W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Trevor Hoyles
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Gustavo Abrantes
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.07
Nathan Naramor
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Arthur Gloer
39W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Bob Cwikla
40W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Adam Schwartz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Waters
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.