Teams

LOCH.Gloer

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-09vs TOC.VinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Gloer / Ben Freeman vs Patrick Grant / Joshua Collins1-6, 0-6
2022-10-02vs TOC.BrownSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Gloer / Seth Layton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJonathan Chang / Everett Laborde vs Parker Sheridan / Spencer Johnson3-6, 1-6
2022-09-18vs MD.WinzenzWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Gloer / Seth Layton vs Andrew Ligay / Andrew Winzenz6-0, 7-5
2022-09-11vs TOC.JavalkarSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndreas Combos / Jeff Cockayne vs Hady Abi-Aad / Jay Tu2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Gloer / Brian Heaphy vs Cecil Turner / Shirish Javalkar6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-28vs TOC.MerckWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Gloer / Seth Layton vs Enric Prat Codina / David Anderson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJonathan Chang / Everett Laborde vs Dennis Coon / Erik Aldereguia7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndreas Combos / Jeff Cockayne vs Kristofer Merck / David Chiu6-3, 6-4
2022-08-21vs MVL.MackLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Cockayne / Everett Laborde vs Ryan Berliner / Scott Benson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-14vs TOC.VinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Gloer / Kevin Mcdonald vs Winston Pantelakos / Richard Papantonis1-6, 0-6
2022-08-07vs TOC.BrownLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteven Gloer / Seth Layton vs Daniel Segan / Jason Tuttle3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBen Freeman / Everett Laborde vs Keith Overfield / Aneesh Kodali0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.23
Steven Gloer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.03
Jeff Cockayne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Seth Layton
published
3.77
Everett Laborde
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.29
Brian Heaphy
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Everett Laborde + Jeff Cockayne5362% gamesnot enough data
Steven Gloer + Jeff Cockayne4257% gamesnot enough data
Everett Laborde + Steven Gloer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Wilkins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Steven Gloer
101W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Jeff Cockayne
156W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
4.03
Seth Layton
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Everett Laborde
89W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Brian Heaphy
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.