Teams

BTC:Weiss

2023 VT Combo 18 & Over Women · 7.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-27vs BTC:CookSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Cawley / Kim McManus vs Jeanne Blackmore / Beth Cook3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Small / Laura Williams vs Melissa Thomas / Kelsey Thomas3-6, 1-6
2023-08-20vs BTC:MelenWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Weiss / Sabine Zerarka vs Katherine Arthaud / Mary Kirkpatrick3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Cawley / Martha Small vs Deidre Riehle / Cynthia Sherburne6-4, 6-1
2023-07-23vs BTC:EricksonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Cawley / Kim McManus vs Aimee Babbott / Lisa Strausser6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMartha Small / Laura Williams vs Cynthia Hesslink / Edye Graning6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs BTC:CookSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMartha Small / Laura Williams vs Jeanne Blackmore / Beth Cook3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Cawley / Sabine Zerarka vs Melissa Thomas / Kelsey Thomas2-6, 3-6
2023-06-18vs BTC:MelenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Weiss / Kim McManus vs Katherine Arthaud / Linda Morgan-Yatzor6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSabine Zerarka / Laura Williams vs Jude Melen / Cindy Fonseca1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-11vs BTC:EricksonWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim McManus / Jennifer Weiss vs Aimee Babbott / Lisa Strausser6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSabine Zerarka / Laura Cawley vs Kathy Erickson / Kathy Hill6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Weiss42931092
2BTC:Cook336615113
3BTC:Melen22351177
4BTC:Erickson13261282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Kim McManus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Sabine Zerarka
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Laura Cawley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Martha Small
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Weiss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Cawley + Kim McManus6156% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim McManus
40W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Sabine Zerarka
58W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Laura Cawley
58W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Martha Small
44W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jennifer Weiss
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.