Teams

BTC:Cook

2023 VT Combo 18 & Over Women · 7.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-27vs BTC:WeissSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Beth Cook vs Laura Cawley / Kim McManus3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Thomas / Kelsey Thomas vs Martha Small / Laura Williams6-3, 6-1
2023-08-20vs BTC:EricksonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Cook / Natalie Neuert vs Kathy Erickson / Cynthia Hesslink4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Deborah Buley vs Deborah Shaw / Lisa Strausser5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-23vs BTC:MelenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Deborah Buley vs Jude Melen / Deidre Riehle3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Cook / Natalie Neuert vs Cindy Fonseca / Linda Morgan-Yatzor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-09vs BTC:WeissSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Beth Cook vs Martha Small / Laura Williams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Thomas / Kelsey Thomas vs Laura Cawley / Sabine Zerarka6-2, 6-3
2023-06-18vs BTC:EricksonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Cook / Jeanne Blackmore vs Lesli Nichols / Deborah Shaw2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Buley / Natalie Neuert vs Edye Graning / Kathy Hill6-4, 6-1
2023-06-11vs BTC:MelenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Melissa Thomas vs Katherine Arthaud / Deidre Riehle4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Buley / Natalie Neuert vs Jude Melen / Linda Morgan-Yatzor4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Weiss42931092
2BTC:Cook336615113
3BTC:Melen22351177
4BTC:Erickson13261282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jeanne Blackmore
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.56
Beth Cook
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.39
Deborah Buley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kelsey Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Neuert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Blackmore + Beth Cook134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeanne Blackmore
65W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Beth Cook
65W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Deborah Buley
14W–23L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.39
Kelsey Thomas
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Neuert
27W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.