Teams

LATA18/Wright/MW

2026 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 2.5 - Night

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-16vs LATA18/Williams/LCTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAubrey Hack / Geneva Irvin vs Sarah Hatcher / Kathy Kearse0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeeAnn Wright / Nahid Swails vs Sarah Simms / Samantha Yager1-6, 3-6
2026-04-09vs LATA18/Prioleau/TSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Sechrest / Michelle Earley vs Tina Houser / Bridgette Williams5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Loudermilk vs Tara Rogers0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRashelle Page / Elizabeth Leslie vs Andrea Peterman / Janice Prioleau1-6, 1-6
2026-04-02vs LATA18/Gascon/SSPLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Fuller / Sydney Quarles vs Deborah Gascon / Rebekah Shaw6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGeneva Irvin vs Chloe Carberry6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAubrey Hack / Melissa Sechrest vs Andrea Ronk / Debra Prosser1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-26vs LATA 2.5W 18 & Over (Parr)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Earley / Rashelle Page vs Le FRYE / Donna Money1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAubrey Hack vs Shay Brown1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNahid Swails / Geneva Irvin vs Kelley Parr / Laurie Phipps1-6, 0-6
2026-03-19vs LATA18/Powers/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Fuller / Geneva Irvin vs Neely Spate / Ashley Quell0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Loudermilk vs Kellie Corbett3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRashelle Page / Elizabeth Leslie vs Klaire Smith / Carolina Lemos2-6, 1-6
2026-03-12vs LATA18/Williams/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSydney Quarles / Melissa Sechrest vs Emma Jenkins / Kathy Kearse2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJessica Loudermilk vs Linda Barrett5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAubrey Hack / LeeAnn Wright vs Sarah Simms / Julie Profilet-saucier3-6, 1-6
2026-03-05vs LATA18/Prioleau/TSLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeeAnn Wright / Sydney Quarles vs Tara Rogers / Andrea Peterman2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNahid Swails vs Mary Miranda0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Sechrest / Elizabeth Leslie vs Janice Prioleau / Tina Houser7-6, 6-4
2026-02-28vs LATA18/Gascon/SSPWon 21
W#1 DoublesRashelle Page / Sydney Quarles vs Sheila Abron / Debra Prosser6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLeeAnn Wright vs C Brooks Wisnewski6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNahid Swails / Jessica Loudermilk vs Andrea Ronk / Renee Davis1-6, 0-6
2026-02-19vs LATA 2.5W 18 & Over (Parr)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Leslie / Jessica Loudermilk vs Kelley Parr / Laurie Phipps0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEnglish Gallery vs Dawn Horton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Sechrest / Rashelle Page vs Laura Switzer / Caroline Pinckney3-6, 3-6
2026-02-12vs LATA18/Powers/LCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Loudermilk / Sydney Quarles vs Kellie Corbett / Ella Stilwell3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAubrey Hack vs Ashley Quell1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeeAnn Wright / Elizabeth Leslie vs Kassidie Reynolds / Carol Powers7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult Women - 2.5 - Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 2.5W 18 & Over (Parr)10027310133
2LATA18/Prioleau/TS55171326217
3LATA18/Wright/MW1952550321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
LeeAnn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.21
Elizabeth Leslie
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.19
Melissa Sechrest
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.14
Sydney Quarles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Rashelle Page
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.06
Michelle Earley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Nahid Swails
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.86
Aubrey Hack
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
1.82
Jessica Loudermilk
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.76
Geneva Irvin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
English Gallery
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LeeAnn Wright
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Elizabeth Leslie
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Melissa Sechrest
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Sydney Quarles
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Rashelle Page
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Michelle Earley
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Nahid Swails
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
2.5
Aubrey Hack
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Jessica Loudermilk
0W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Geneva Irvin
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
English Gallery
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.