Teams

LATA18/Gascon/SSP

2026 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 2.5 - Night

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-16vs LATA 2.5W 18 & Over (Parr)Split 11
W#1 DoublesRebekah Shaw / Renee Davis vs Donna Money / Christa Geib7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAshley Rojas vs Monica Conklin2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-09vs LATA18/Williams/LCTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Prosser / Jessica Bower vs Sarah Simms / Kathy Kearse2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChloe Carberry / Sandra Johnson vs Patricia Williams / Alexandra Shertzer2-6, 1-6
2026-04-02vs LATA18/Wright/MWWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Gascon / Rebekah Shaw vs Kristen Fuller / Sydney Quarles0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChloe Carberry vs Geneva Irvin0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ronk / Debra Prosser vs Aubrey Hack / Melissa Sechrest6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-26vs LATA18/Powers/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebekah Shaw / Debra Prosser vs Ashley Quell / Neely Spate0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChloe Carberry vs Kassidie Reynolds0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Ronk / Sandra Johnson vs Elise Bui / Carolina Lemos1-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs LATA18/Prioleau/TSLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Gascon / Renee Davis vs Andrea Peterman / Tara Rogers2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSheila Abron vs Mary Miranda0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChloe Carberry / C Brooks Wisnewski vs Janice Prioleau / Tina Houser1-6, 3-6
2026-03-12vs LATA 2.5W 18 & Over (Parr)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesC Brooks Wisnewski / Amanda Rogers vs Le FRYE / Donna Money2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Rojas vs Rebecca Keilty4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChloe Carberry / Sandra Johnson vs Christa Geib / Caroline Pinckney1-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs LATA18/Williams/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Bower / Deborah Gascon vs Sarah Hatcher / Samantha Yager1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Rojas vs Linda Barrett3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Ronk / Rebekah Shaw vs Jennifer LeSuer / Julie Profilet-saucier3-6, 4-6
2026-02-28vs LATA18/Wright/MWLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Abron / Debra Prosser vs Rashelle Page / Sydney Quarles2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesC Brooks Wisnewski vs LeeAnn Wright0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ronk / Renee Davis vs Nahid Swails / Jessica Loudermilk6-1, 6-0
2026-02-19vs LATA18/Powers/LCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChloe Carberry / Sheila Abron vs Ella Stilwell / Carol Powers1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRebekah Shaw vs Kellie Corbett1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Rogers / Andrea Ronk vs Klaire Smith / Elise Bui3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-12vs LATA18/Prioleau/TSWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Gascon / Renee Davis vs Andrea Peterman / Alyssa Fencel3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Rojas vs Janice Prioleau6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebra Prosser / C Brooks Wisnewski vs Tina Houser / Judy Smith6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 2.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.47
Renee Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amanda Rogers
published 2.5
2.23
Andrea Ronk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Ashley Rojas
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
2.09
C Brooks Wisnewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.08
Rebekah Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
1.96
Deborah Gascon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.96
Debra Prosser
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.78
Chloe Carberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.59
Sheila Abron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jessica Bower
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Gascon + Jessica Bower1539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Davis
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Amanda Rogers
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Andrea Ronk
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Ashley Rojas
5W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
C Brooks Wisnewski
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Rebekah Shaw
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Deborah Gascon
4W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Debra Prosser
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Chloe Carberry
1W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Sheila Abron
0W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.59
Jessica Bower
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Madison Davenport
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.