Teams

Bray - NC - Southaven

2025 Mixed 18&Over-NC · 3.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-08vs Fullilove - NC - OxfordLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Larkin / Corey Richter vs Kathlene Poulelis / Heath Fullilove2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Crain / David Bray vs Ashley Brewer / Landon Fullilove2-6, 2-6
2025-07-01vs Fullilove - NC - OxfordLost 02
L#1 DoublesCorey Richter / Jennifer Larkin vs Landon Fullilove / Ashley Brewer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Bray / Sonja Dickey vs Heath Fullilove / Kathlene Poulelis1-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs Young-NC-SouthavenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Larkin / Corey Richter vs Houstyn Loosier / Eric Barnes0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSonja Dickey / David Bray vs Jennifer Doyle / Keegan Coleman5-7, 4-6
2025-06-18vs Young-NC-SouthavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSonja Dickey / Corey Richter vs Jennifer Doyle / Dinesh Nugegoda2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMadeline Bray / David Bray vs Shea Young / Zane Coleman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Crain / Glenn Neilson vs Maggie Neal / Eric Barnes4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Corey Richter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Glenn Neilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brittany Crain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
David Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Madeline Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Susan Patrone
published
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Sonja Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Bray + Madeline Bray314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Larkin + Corey Richter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Corey Richter
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Glenn Neilson
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Brittany Crain
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
David Bray
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Madeline Bray
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
7W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Sonja Dickey
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.