Teams

Young-NC-Southaven

2025 Mixed 18&Over-NC · 3.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-25vs Bray - NC - SouthavenWon 20
W#1 DoublesHoustyn Loosier / Eric Barnes vs Jennifer Larkin / Corey Richter6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Doyle / Keegan Coleman vs Sonja Dickey / David Bray7-5, 6-4
2025-06-24vs Fullilove - NC - OxfordWon 21
W#1 DoublesHoustyn Loosier / Eric Barnes vs Vicki Lindsay / Heath Fullilove4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShea Young / Zane Coleman vs Ralph Banks / Lindsay Banks6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaggie Neal / Keegan Coleman vs Ashley Brewer / Landon Fullilove1-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs Bray - NC - SouthavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Doyle / Dinesh Nugegoda vs Sonja Dickey / Corey Richter6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShea Young / Zane Coleman vs Madeline Bray / David Bray6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaggie Neal / Eric Barnes vs Brittany Crain / Glenn Neilson6-4, 6-2
2025-06-10vs Fullilove - NC - OxfordLost 03
L#1 DoublesMadeline Johnson / Keegan Coleman vs Cashe Shows / Vicki Lindsay0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie Neal / Tony Neal vs Heath Fullilove / Kathlene Poulelis1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZane Coleman / Houstyn Loosier vs Ashley Brewer / Bill Clark5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Michael Rude
published
3.08
Shea Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Eric Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Zane Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Houstyn Loosier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.62
Maggie Neal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Keegan Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dinesh Nugegoda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tony Neal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Rude
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Shea Young
62W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.08
Eric Barnes
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Zane Coleman
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Houstyn Loosier
33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Maggie Neal
20W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Keegan Coleman
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Dinesh Nugegoda
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tony Neal
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.