Teams

RMTC YELLOW

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-09vs MEA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Scheff / Katie Hanel vs Kim Congedo / Holly Semanske1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCara Hoving vs Marianne Martin6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTamny Costello / MacY Miller vs Claire Lochridge / Lauren Noyes2-6, 2-6
2021-09-07vs NJ BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesCara Hoving / Catherine Ruelas vs Kristy Matteson / Deena Green7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Scheff vs Ingrid Palmer1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTamny Costello / Katie Hanel vs Susan Miller / Karen Kirby2-6, 1-6
2021-09-02vs RCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCara Hoving / Catherine Ruelas vs Rachelle Schowe / Morgan Ernzen7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKatie Hanel vs Morgan Holleran2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTamny Costello / MacY Miller vs Agnes Diffoot / Karen Stuckemeyer6-1, 6-4
2021-08-26vs BRMST BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Scheff / Katie Hanel vs Leigh Harris / Kelly Walter1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMacY Miller vs Lisa Francisco6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTamny Costello / Cara Hoving vs Erin Johnson / Stella Mastrogiovanni6-2, 6-0
2021-08-18vs CVTA REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCara Hoving / Catherine Ruelas vs Joni Roberts / Kristen Keller6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJustine Allison vs Marsha Ruggeri5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMacY Miller / Katie Hanel vs Anne Sterrett / Susan Despotopulos6-4, 6-1
2021-08-05vs NJ PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Scheff / Katie Hanel vs Laura Kelly / Janet Colvin2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMacY Miller vs Susan Tomlinson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTamny Costello / Catherine Ruelas vs Sara Quackenbush / Mary Rose Wilder2-6, 1-6
2021-07-29vs TTA BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesTamny Costello / Cara Hoving vs Lisa Shaver / Kristen Womer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMacY Miller vs Nohemi Almaraz2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJustine Allison / Catherine Ruelas vs Allison Brickey / Heather Gardner4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCC PINK70201372
2RCC NAVY70183677
3WC PINK60162590
4SSLT MAROON611837123
5BM NAVY6115613110
6SH TEAL5215615142
7PTC SILVER5212919147
8PCC GOLD5212919162
9GAC PINK5212921159
10HIW PINK43111021162
11KC MAROON43111022173
12VC PINK43111023189
13RHCC PURPLE34101122167
14RMTC YELLOW3481326198
15GCC PINK3471429186
16HV PINK2481021151
17CCV ORANGE2581328193
18WP PURPLE2581329210
19CVTA PINK1671429200
20WC MAROON1671429191
21BM SILVER1651633217
22HV SILVER1651633203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cara Hoving
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
2.85
Catherine Ruelas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Tamny Costello
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.55
Justine Allison
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.10
Amy Scheff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
MacY Miller
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Katie Hanel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamny Costello + Cara Hoving314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Scheff + Katie Hanel033 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Catherine Ruelas123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Ruelas + Cara Hoving303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cara Hoving
97W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
3
Catherine Ruelas
67W–25L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Tamny Costello
44W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
Justine Allison
30W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Amy Scheff
21W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.10
MacY Miller
25W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Katie Hanel
1W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.