Teams

NJ BLUE

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-09vs TTA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesDeena Green / Karen Kirby vs Kristen Womer / Lisa Shaver1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristy Matteson vs Nohemi Almaraz4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Ingrid Palmer vs Allison Brickey / Heather Gardner6-3, 6-4
2021-09-07vs RMTC YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristy Matteson / Deena Green vs Cara Hoving / Catherine Ruelas6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIngrid Palmer vs Amy Scheff6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Karen Kirby vs Tamny Costello / Katie Hanel6-2, 6-1
2021-09-02vs MEA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesIngrid Palmer / Kristy Matteson vs Amanda Wember / Kim Obert4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMaile Inagaki vs Holly Semanske2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Karen Kirby vs Lauren Noyes / Kim Congedo6-4, 6-2
2021-08-26vs RCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Miller / Karen Kirby vs Rhonda Plambeck / Morgan Holleran2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDeena Green vs Carolyn Braun0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristy Matteson / Maile Inagaki vs Christina Sjolin / ALICE PACER6-4, 6-1
2021-08-25vs BRMST BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Miller / Deena Green vs Erin Johnson / Stella Mastrogiovanni6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMaile Inagaki vs Kelly Walter2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesIngrid Palmer / Kristy Matteson vs Laura Kruse / Janine Huber6-2, 6-2
2021-08-09vs CVTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeena Green / Susan Miller vs Anne Sterrett / Kristen Keller6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKristy Matteson vs Marsha Ruggeri6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMaile Inagaki / Ingrid Palmer vs Hope Yasbin Engel / Joni Roberts6-4, 7-5
2021-08-04vs NJ PINKLost 02
L#1 SinglesIngrid Palmer vs Janet Colvin4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Miller / Deena Green vs Margaret Parris / Laura Kelly6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Ingrid Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.54
Deena Green
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.26
Karen Kirby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristy Matteson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maile Inagaki
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deena Green + Ingrid Palmer362454% games+4.6% vs expected
Deena Green + Karen Kirby4343% gamesnot enough data
Deena Green + Kristy Matteson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ingrid Palmer
85W–65L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Deena Green
97W–103L career · 6 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.54
Karen Kirby
54W–76L career · 4 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.26
Kristy Matteson
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maile Inagaki
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.