Teams

Wallace/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-21vs Ranero/Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMarie Hope Kirkland / Susan McVicker vs Stacy Baskin / Donna Leedle1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Werther vs Tammy Jirjis4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCelia Turner / Felice Oldacre vs Barbara Grubbs / Jane Crenshaw6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelanie Mohr / Debbi Booton vs Barbara Hooper / Glenda Jordan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesMonica McDougall / Lisa Wallace vs Trina Gilbert / Beth Lawrence6-4, 6-2
2025-03-17vs Ranero/Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Wallace / Kathryn Harlan vs Kathleen Doulin / Barbara Hooper0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebbi Booton / Melanie Mohr vs Katie Feyes / Jeanai Kluge7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRegina Nutter / Felice Oldacre vs Glenda Jordan / Barbara Grubbs0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#4 DoublesDana Griscom / Susan McVicker vs Stephanie Feyes / Trina Gilbert0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Monica McDougall
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Lisa Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Felice Oldacre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Celia Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Debbi Booton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Beth Werther
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Regina Nutter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Melanie Mohr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Dana Griscom
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Jeanie Barrier
published
3.44
Susan McVicker
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Marie Hope Kirkland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Nita Hollis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celia Turner + Lisa Wallace4258% games+5.9% vs expected
Dana Griscom + Jeanie Barrier3449% games+3.4% vs expected
Monica McDougall + Lisa Wallace213 matchesnot enough data
Marie Hope Kirkland + Nita Hollis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica McDougall
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Lisa Wallace
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Felice Oldacre
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Celia Turner
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Debbi Booton
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Beth Werther
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Regina Nutter
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Melanie Mohr
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Dana Griscom
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jeanie Barrier
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Susan McVicker
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Marie Hope Kirkland
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
Nita Hollis
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.