Teams

Ranero/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - Monday AM

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-21vs Wallace/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesStacy Baskin / Donna Leedle vs Marie Hope Kirkland / Susan McVicker6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTammy Jirjis vs Beth Werther6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Grubbs / Jane Crenshaw vs Celia Turner / Felice Oldacre4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Hooper / Glenda Jordan vs Melanie Mohr / Debbi Booton6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesTrina Gilbert / Beth Lawrence vs Monica McDougall / Lisa Wallace4-6, 2-6
2025-04-07vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatie Feyes / Jeanai Kluge vs Mollie Alvarez / Rachel Fogarty6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTammy Jirjis vs Lily Qu6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrina Gilbert / Beth Lawrence vs Michelle Reyzer / Wendy Mangialardi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHollie Williams / Heidi Nickel vs Traci Holton / Shari Glickman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#4 DoublesHeather Laney / Julie Segura vs Kelly Clapp / Lynn Butler6-2, 6-0
2025-03-17vs Wallace/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesKathleen Doulin / Barbara Hooper vs Lisa Wallace / Kathryn Harlan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Feyes / Jeanai Kluge vs Debbi Booton / Melanie Mohr5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesGlenda Jordan / Barbara Grubbs vs Regina Nutter / Felice Oldacre6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesStephanie Feyes / Trina Gilbert vs Dana Griscom / Susan McVicker6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Stephanie Feyes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Jeanai Kluge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Paula Mcgowan
published
3.91
Glenda Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Tammy Jirjis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Heather Laney
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Trina Gilbert
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Katie Feyes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.74
Barbara Grubbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Beth Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Stacy Baskin
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
Kathleen Doulin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Donna Leedle
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Heidi Nickel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Barbara Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Jane Crenshaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Julie Segura
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Hollie Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Pat Yung-Okamoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Feyes + Stephanie Feyes7067% games+13.1% vs expected
Stacy Baskin + Donna Leedle7166% games+10.0% vs expected
Jane Crenshaw + Barbara Grubbs4653% games+4.5% vs expected
Heather Laney + Kathleen Doulin6358% games−5.3% vs expected
Julie Segura + Hollie Williams1739% games−7.0% vs expected
Barbara Hooper + Kathleen Doulin2446% games−7.4% vs expected
Beth Lawrence + Trina Gilbert5552% games−10.5% vs expected
Jeanai Kluge + Katie Feyes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Feyes
34W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Jeanai Kluge
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Paula Mcgowan
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Glenda Jordan
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Tammy Jirjis
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Heather Laney
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Trina Gilbert
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Katie Feyes
24W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Grubbs
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Beth Lawrence
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Stacy Baskin
14W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kathleen Doulin
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Donna Leedle
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Heidi Nickel
70W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Barbara Hooper
11W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Jane Crenshaw
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Julie Segura
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Hollie Williams
17W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Pat Yung-Okamoto
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.