Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Arwa Kaddoura
published 4
3.44
Julie Neeb
published
3.38
Sabrina McQueen
published
3.33
Audra Lutter
published 3.5
3.27
Brigitte Shaw
published 3.5
3.24
Courtney Bock
published 3.5
3.24
Michelle Holcenberg
published
3.24
Dana Andrew
published 3.5
3.16
Mia Dennis
published
3.12
Wendy Greer
published
3.12
Hazel Indick
published
3.11
Teri Frangie
published
3.01
Kirsten Lang
published
2.44
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigitte Shaw + Audra Lutter224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Andrew + Michelle Holcenberg033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Neeb + Courtney Bock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arwa Kaddoura
54W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
4.07
Julie Neeb
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Sabrina McQueen
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Audra Lutter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Brigitte Shaw
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Courtney Bock
23W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Michelle Holcenberg
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Andrew
10W–23L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Mia Dennis
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Hazel Indick
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kirsten Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Cara Mia Barnacascel
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.