Teams

MY Jellison SSL A18-4.0M

2025 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

15 players · average NTRP 3.81 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-21vs PTC Tjalsma SSL A18-4.0MSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNoah Tanguay / Jack Jellison vs Christopher Stevens / Bradley Miedema6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Rinder vs Daniel Bragg4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Carnes / Robert Foti vs Ryan McNamara / Joon Young Han6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEnrique Domeier vs Troy Herczak6-1, 7-5
2025-06-07vs MVH Hoffman SSL A18-4.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Foti / Noah Tanguay vs Lance Mckinney / Paul Hoffman7-6, 6-3
2025-05-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesJack Jellison / Noah Tanguay vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-26vs WH Ballines SSL A18-4.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesJack Jellison / Noah Tanguay vs Samuel Shnowske / Bill Wisser6-2, 7-5
2025-04-19vs MSU Cuyar SSL A18-4.0MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBen Critz / Alex Muresan vs Jared Stratz / Michael Gonzales3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDaniel Rinder vs Austin Nevitt6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEnrique Domeier / Noah Tanguay vs Mark Glover / John Nelligan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Carnes / Jack Jellison vs Christopher Cuyar / Zachary Dillinger7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-22vs MVC Smith SSL A18-4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesBen Critz / Noah Tanguay vs Matthew Weiden / Robert Lotzar3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs PTC Bont SSL A18-4.0MWon 41
L#1 DoublesJack Jellison / Noah Tanguay vs Trent Pontious / Zachary Rabitoy3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEnrique Domeier vs Samuel Deroos6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Foti / Christopher Carnes vs Scott Bont / Patrick Snyder1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDamond Timmerman vs Aj Clark6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoeb Wuerthele / Alex Muresan vs Steven Deroos / Kris Ransberger6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Noah Tanguay
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
Damond Timmerman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Corbin Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Enrique Domeier
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
3.68
Jack Jellison
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.64
Ryan Langejans
published
3.63
Ben Critz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Daniel Rinder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Piotr Mietusiewicz
published
3.45
Alex Muresan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Robert Foti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Doug Leonard
published
3.32
Christopher Carnes
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Andrew Alcaraz
published 3.5
Joeb Wuerthele
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Foti + Christopher Carnes6458% games+11.8% vs expected
Doug Leonard + Damond Timmerman12556% games+11.6% vs expected
Doug Leonard + Robert Foti20660% games+4.7% vs expected
Alex Muresan + Piotr Mietusiewicz2449% games−2.7% vs expected
Robert Foti + Damond Timmerman4348% games−4.2% vs expected
Enrique Domeier + Jack Jellison2937% games−9.7% vs expected
Noah Tanguay + Enrique Domeier4253% gamesnot enough data
Alex Muresan + Robert Foti1434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Noah Tanguay
54W–31L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Damond Timmerman
51W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Corbin Wallace
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Enrique Domeier
20W–41L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jack Jellison
15W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Ryan Langejans
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Ben Critz
32W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Daniel Rinder
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Piotr Mietusiewicz
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Alex Muresan
30W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Robert Foti
112W–106L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Doug Leonard
63W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Christopher Carnes
56W–43L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrew Alcaraz
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Joeb Wuerthele
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.