Teams

Boulevard - Croom

2023 IRMSL Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 SPRING Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Cheryl von Zielinski vs Marcia Barnes / Karen Lindenberger3-6, 3-6
2023-05-10vs IRMSL/Palmer/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Rachael McLaurin vs Renee' Palmer / Grace Pillari1-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs Quail - Garcia/MarengoWon 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Croom / Rachael McLaurin vs Jennifer Malone Watson / Kristin Notte6-2, 6-3
2023-04-12vs Quail - Garcia/MarengoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Cheryl von Zielinski vs Sara Lloyd / Tara Ramsey6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 SPRING Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Mary Lunn
published
3.67
Rachael McLaurin
published
3.43
3.31
Cynthia Croom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Dean
published
3.18
Nancy Barry
published
3.10
Pia Gold
published
3.10
Lori Averell
published
3.08
Jennifer Cancio
published
2.88
Joan Dobravsky
published
Lisa Brinegar
published
Marie Woodhull
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barry + Melissa Dean5067% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Barry + Lori Averell134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Lunn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Rachael McLaurin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
3.5
Cheryl von Zielinski
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
Melissa Dean
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Nancy Barry
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Pia Gold
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Lori Averell
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Cancio
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.08
Joan Dobravsky
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Lisa Brinegar
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Woodhull
1W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.