Teams

LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 55AW7.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Nancy Doan
published
3.64
Liz Medalle
published
3.59
Lynn Losande
published
3.52
Sheila Kilty
published
3.51
Tanya Lo
published
3.49
Lily Boris
published
3.43
Margie Moran
published
3.38
Dorita Castillano
published 3.5
3.30
Susan Weeks
published
3.16
Pearl Leung
published
3.13
JoAnn Pawid
published
3.10
Caroline Hauck
published 3.5
2.98
Sandy Macasieb
published
2.91
Nellie Proulx
published
2.87
JoAnn Mar
published
2.81
Dana Takahashi
published 3
2.79
Gloria Sue
published 3
Gunnel Nyberg
published 3
2.61
LyLy Kim
published
2.60
Charlotte Niel
published 3
Lori Wong
published
Pauline Ho
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pearl Leung + Dana Takahashi5158% games−7.1% vs expected
Pearl Leung + Liz Medalle5163% gamesnot enough data
Margie Moran + Caroline Hauck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Doan
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Liz Medalle
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.64
Lynn Losande
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sheila Kilty
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
Tanya Lo
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Lily Boris
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Margie Moran
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Dorita Castillano
27W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Susan Weeks
25W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Pearl Leung
38W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.16
JoAnn Pawid
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Caroline Hauck
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sandy Macasieb
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Nellie Proulx
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
JoAnn Mar
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Dana Takahashi
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gloria Sue
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Gunnel Nyberg
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
LyLy Kim
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
0%20%80%
2.61
3
Charlotte Niel
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lori Wong
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pauline Ho
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.