Teams

RCCB - Hingle

2026 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-06-17vs Kiwi - CarlsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Douglas / Tee Wells vs Allison Wyand / Erin O'Brien0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Lawley / Alicia Sucre vs Katey Benne / Eileen Bennett1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jennifer Oglesby
published
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
DEE MANUEL
published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
published 3.5
3.21
Kerry Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Lindsay Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Ruthan Tattersall
published
2.56
Katherine Hingle
published
2.56
Eileen Bentley
published 3
2.51
Alicia Sucre
published 2.5
2.46
2.42
Jennifer Bailey
published
2.21
Michelle Lawley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Joanne Ludwig
published
Kelli Cordis
published
MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Sawyer + Lindsay Nichols3263% games+6.3% vs expected
Ruthan Tattersall + Katherine Hingle4257% games+6.1% vs expected
Kerry Sawyer + Ruthan Tattersall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Oglesby
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
DEE MANUEL
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kerry Sawyer
39W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Lindsay Nichols
33W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Ruthan Tattersall
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Katherine Hingle
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Eileen Bentley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
2.5
Alicia Sucre
31W–16L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
3
Christy Galzerano
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jennifer Bailey
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Michelle Lawley
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Joanne Ludwig
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Kelli Cordis
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.