Teams

Kiwi - Carlson

2026 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.06 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-22vs EFSC - WoodsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Wyand / Tracey Draper vs Leslie Love / Tracy Jacobus2-6, 1-6
2026-07-15vs RCCB - VickersWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin O'Brien / Allison Wyand vs Sue Lutter / Brittany Reiter6-4, 6-1
2026-07-08vs EFSC - OhlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Wyand / Erin O'Brien vs Lisa LeDoux / Milena Alicea6-0, 6-2
2026-06-17vs RCCB - HingleWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Wyand / Erin O'Brien vs Susan Douglas / Tee Wells6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Erin O'Brien
published 3.5
3.38
Anne Ramsey
published 3.5
3.27
Allison Wyand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Maria Diegnan
published
3.07
Tracey Draper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Tracy Famiano
published
2.91
Julianne Moore
published
2.80
Angila Burke
published 3
2.75
2.74
Patricia de Simone
published
2.67
Pam Mcfadden
published
2.52
Danielle Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Eileen Bennett
published 2.5
2.38
Stacy Konrad
published
2.27
Anne Burns
published 2.5
2.19
Katey Benne
published
2.08
Susan Hala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julianne Moore + Angila Burke6159% games+10.7% vs expected
Tracey Draper + Allison Wyand71047% games+0.4% vs expected
Pam Mcfadden + Susan Hala123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin O'Brien
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Anne Ramsey
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Allison Wyand
69W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Maria Diegnan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Tracey Draper
69W–115L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tracy Famiano
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.95
Julianne Moore
22W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Angila Burke
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christina M Tuccio
3W–3L career · type T · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Patricia de Simone
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Pam Mcfadden
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.67
2.5
Danielle Carlson
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Eileen Bennett
8W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Stacy Konrad
10W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Anne Burns
10W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Katey Benne
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Susan Hala
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.