Teams

EFSC - Woods

2026 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs EFSC - OhlinLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Cozad / Katie Little vs Susan Ford / Milena Alicea2-6, 1-6
2026-07-29vs Fee - NormanLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Cozad / Suzanne McBride vs Katherine Plescow / Kim Tice1-6, 6-7
2026-07-22vs Kiwi - CarlsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Valeska Redon vs Susan Hala / Eileen Bennett4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-08vs Suntree - RezaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Altair Watson vs Mandy Smith / Sacha Armstrong1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Valeska Redon vs Sharon Ford / Kathryn Nitti6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Ferreira / Amanda Mccaughin vs Maria Reza / Wendy Paul3-6, 1-6
2026-07-06vs RCCB - VickersWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Amber Saxon vs Sue Lutter / Diana Hayslip4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne McBride / Renee Jiannine vs Maryanne Donigan / Eileen Mcelwee6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLinda Mesnard / Anna Marie Pippett vs Chonda Rodrigo-butler / Catalina Calvert2-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs Fee - NormanWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Renee Jiannine vs Bonita Madden / Kim Tice6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Tracy Jacobus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Sallie Benke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Leslie Love
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Altair Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Amber Saxon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Denise Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Suzanne McBride
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Cindy Cozad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Valeska Redon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Katie Little
published
2.50
Lael Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Tammy Bertolini
published
2.36
Anna Marie Pippett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Linda Mesnard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Mccaughin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Catherine Ferreira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Lael Woods + Stephanie Lasko1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Jacobus
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sallie Benke
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Leslie Love
17W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Altair Watson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Amber Saxon
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Denise Stanley
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Suzanne McBride
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Cindy Cozad
51W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Valeska Redon
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
Stephanie Lasko
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Katie Little
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.63
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Tammy Bertolini
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Anna Marie Pippett
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Linda Mesnard
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Catherine Ferreira
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.