Teams

EFSC - Ohlin

2026 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.70 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-05vs EFSC - WoodsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Lamp / Lisa LeDoux vs Denise Stanley / Tracy Jacobus6-4, 7-5
2026-07-29vs RCCB - VickersLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Lamp / Lisa LeDoux vs Sue Lutter / Melissa Vickers2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElla Garruto / Dorota Dembinska vs Brenda Tarquinio / Maryanne Donigan3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCalli Ohlin / Brianna Stevens vs Michelle Kne / Mona Peterson2-6, 1-6
2026-07-15vs Fee - NormanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa LeDoux / Dorota Dembinska vs Samantha Swaggerty / Judy Beckler1-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs Kiwi - CarlsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa LeDoux / Milena Alicea vs Allison Wyand / Erin O'Brien0-6, 2-6
2026-06-26vs EFSC - WoodsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Lamp / Lisa LeDoux vs Tracy Jacobus / Sallie Benke0-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs Suntree - RezaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Lamp / Lisa LeDoux vs Dana Saunders / Mandy Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs RCCB - VickersLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa LeDoux / Melissa Lamp vs Sue Lutter / Melissa Vickers6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Ford / Dorota Dembinska vs Angela Wong / Brenda Tarquinio4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lisa LeDoux
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.04
Melissa Lamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Milena Alicea
published
2.52
Dorota Dembinska
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Alix Amozig
published 2.5
1.87
Calli Ohlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.80
Daniella Archer
published 2.5
1.71
Brianna Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ella Garruto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gabriella Collura
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Lamp + Lisa LeDoux123 matchesnot enough data
Calli Ohlin + Brianna Stevens033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa LeDoux
166W–94L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Melissa Lamp
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Dorota Dembinska
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Alix Amozig
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Calli Ohlin
0W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
2.5
Daniella Archer
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.80
2.5
Brianna Stevens
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.71
Ella Garruto
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Gabriella Collura
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.