Teams

GCC:40+ Love:Lockwood/Castine

2022 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

18 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-06vs WTC:Hit and Run:TannerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKim Mixer / Leslie Lombino vs Jill Newman / Tina Reid2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCynthia Ever vs Lainie Goldstein2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wells / Madelyn Jolliffe vs Sandra Khouri / Linda Lee6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLorie Cunningham / Stephanie Packard vs Brigitte Tanner / Jan Wild2-6, 1-6
2022-02-06vs CP:Net Gains 40+:das Neves/SweetLost 13
L#1 DoublesCecilie Jedlicka / Kim Mixer vs Laura Galante / Meaghan Nolan4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Oona Robinson2-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wells / Madelyn Jolliffe vs Melissa Straub / Maria Das Neves3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Packard / Karen Snow vs Christina OHagan / Cintia Shiro3-6, 1-6
2022-01-30vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCecilie Jedlicka / Kim Mixer vs Carole Allers / Debbie Cannavino3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Dorothy Spenner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Lorie Cunningham vs Tiffany Bevacqua / Senta Cassell1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Boutry / Susanna Nichols vs Anne-Lise Brown / Nina Lota7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCecilie Jedlicka / Kim Mixer vs Toni Sturm / Deborah Salomon2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Jennifer Weitz7-5, 4-5
L#2 DoublesMadelyn Jolliffe / Elizabeth Wells vs Christina Scherwin / Melissa Edwards3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Castine / Elizabeth Boutry vs Jill Bakken / Kathi Holbert4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKim Mixer / Cecilie Jedlicka vs Maryann Cantone / Felicia DeSanto1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Elizabeth Boutry vs Dawn Hone / Lisa Dawson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Lockwood / Madelyn Jolliffe vs Jennifer Corrado / Christine Moore6-2, 6-1
2021-12-05vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownLost 04
L#1 DoublesLaurie Curtis / Cecilie Jedlicka vs Michelle Kanter / Claire Londa3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Carole Allers5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Castine / Giovanna Miller vs Maren Nelson / Mallory Close4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusanna Nichols / Karen Snow vs Anne-Lise Brown / Barbara Kulesz3-6, 4-6
2021-11-14vs WTC:Hit and Run:TannerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCecilie Jedlicka / Kim Mixer vs Carol Murray / Berry Ravitz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Sonia Arana5-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Laurie Curtis vs Genevieve Pettinato / Michele Newberger2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Wells / Madelyn Jolliffe vs Brigitte Tanner / Sandra Khouri1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-08vs NC:Salomon Slice Girls:Salomon/IsazaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCecilie Jedlicka / Betsy Moreno Berger vs Jill Bakken / Christina Scherwin2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Wendy Laychak1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMadelyn Jolliffe / Lorie Cunningham vs Pilar Estrada / Wendy Bennett3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Hopper / Susanna Nichols vs Kelly Genova / Kathi Holbert6-0, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lombino / Laurie Curtis vs Cinthia Griot / Heike Martens4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Louise Hagstrom6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Snow / Stephanie Packard vs Lisa Dawson / Maryann Cantone1-6, 1-6
2021-10-03vs CP:Net Gains 40+:das Neves/SweetLost 04
L#1 DoublesCecilie Jedlicka / Janet Sellge vs Laura Galante / Meaghan Nolan1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lockwood vs Kelly Ryan-Gartrell0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Castine / Laurie Curtis vs Alexis Sweet / Candy Yeager5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusanna Nichols / Lorie Cunningham vs Maria Das Neves / Amy Salley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1D - 4S:Cougars:Williams000000
2MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelis09211538312
3TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick09201639327
4MIT:Nice Aces:Perkins/Ferguson09181843338
5MRC:40+ 4.0:Cushnie09132352357
6KH:New Ad-Itudes:Brown010231737334
7CP:Net Gains 40+:das Neves/Sweet010231739338
8WTC:Game, Set, Match!:Myers/Chalupka010261442328
9WTC:Hit and Run:Tanner010182249362
10GCC:40+ Love:Lockwood/Castine010112965429

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Elizabeth Boutry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cecilie Jedlicka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cynthia Ever
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Elizabeth Wells
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Kim Mixer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Susanna Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.44
Anne Castine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Giovanna Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Patricia Hopper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Cole
published
Karen Snow
published
Leslie Lombino
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lorie Cunningham
published
Madelyn Jolliffe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Pat Greeff
published
Stephanie Packard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Lockwood
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susanna Nichols + Elizabeth Boutry10067% games+14.5% vs expected
Susanna Nichols + Anne Castine4358% games+11.0% vs expected
Patricia Hopper + Susanna Nichols4549% games+6.4% vs expected
Anne Castine + Kim Mixer4259% games+2.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Wells + Madelyn Jolliffe293847% games−3.8% vs expected
Cecilie Jedlicka + Kim Mixer2637% games−8.9% vs expected
Cecilie Jedlicka + Anne Castine044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Pat Greeff + Cecilie Jedlicka123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Boutry
57W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Betsy Moreno Berger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cecilie Jedlicka
23W–28L career · type S · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cynthia Ever
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Wells
93W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kim Mixer
46W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Susanna Nichols
225W–190L career · 11 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Anne Castine
97W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Giovanna Miller
51W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Hopper
30W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
Ashley Cole
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Snow
13W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Lombino
49W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorie Cunningham
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Madelyn Jolliffe
90W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Pat Greeff
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Packard
9W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Lockwood
18W–43L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.