Teams

TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick

2022 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-03-06vs D - 4S:Cougars:WilliamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Margret Greene / Marti Correa6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKerstin Lebel / Claudia Lacasia vs Elizabeth Griffin / Kendal Gaillard1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Hetal Kocinsky vs Cally Adl / Christiane Goldman6-3, 6-4
2022-02-27vs MRC:40+ 4.0:CushnieLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarykate Root / Claudia Lacasia vs Patricia Dengler / Ann Kuegler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Crowe vs Kimberly Nyklicek6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Jane Kim vs Lillan Hope / Barbara Kiselak7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMisao Naito / Hetal Kocinsky vs Beckie Ferris / Marie Vongsouvanh5-7, 4-6
2022-02-13vs MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelisWon 30
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Marykate Root vs Michele Palanzo / Audra Edele6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Suzanne Crowe vs Susan Haven / Jacquelyn Hutchison6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Hetal Kocinsky vs Kira Lent / Nicole Gammino3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-30vs MIT:Nice Aces:Perkins/FergusonWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Marykate Root vs Christina Marini / Mari Ullyett6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJane Kim / Suzanne Crowe vs Kristen Doyle / Virginia Greatsinger7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Ann Garvey vs Kristin Daley / Lynn Siebert4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-23vs D - 4S:Cougars:WilliamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Kendal Gaillard / Gretchen Kilmartin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJane Kim / Suzanne Crowe vs Wendy English / Cheryl Levine6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Misao Naito vs Amy Margulies / Margret Greene1-6, 1-6
2022-01-09vs MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarykate Root / Claudia Lacasia vs Michele Palanzo / Nancy McDonough6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJane Kim vs Allison Umbricht4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Zubrinsky / Sue Broderick vs Bobbi Deangelis / Sarah Donahue4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Garvey / Hetal Kocinsky vs Susan Haven / Jacquelyn Hutchison6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-12-05vs MRC:40+ 4.0:CushnieWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Marykate Root vs Karen Cushnie / Ellen O'Donnell6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Suzanne Crowe vs Barbara Kiselak / Lillan Hope6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Garvey / Hetal Kocinsky vs Julie Sterling / Liz Cummings6-4, 6-2
2021-11-21vs MIT:Nice Aces:Perkins/FergusonLost 13
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Marykate Root vs Virginia Greatsinger / Mari Ullyett6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesClaudia Lacasia vs Christina Marini2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Barbara Hutchins vs Judit Farkas / Erzsebet Pusztai1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCher Anderson / Gillian Sizer vs Graziana Weill / Milla Pospisil5-7, 1-6
2021-11-07vs MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelisWon 30
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Michele Palanzo / Kristin Sabatini4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Hetal Kocinsky vs Bobbi Deangelis / Nancy McDonough6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Kim / Suzanne Crowe vs Jacquelyn Hutchison / Nicole Gammino6-3, 7-6
2021-10-17vs MRC:40+ 4.0:CushnieWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Jackie Zoldy / Julie Mooney6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Marykate Root vs Karen Cushnie / Patricia Dengler6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnn Garvey / Barbara Hutchins vs Julie Sterling / Marie Vongsouvanh1-6, 0-6
2021-10-03vs MIT:Nice Aces:Perkins/FergusonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Kerstin Lebel vs Mari Ullyett / Christina Marini6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnn Garvey vs Courtney Sansonetti6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Virginia Greatsinger / Judit Farkas6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Misao Naito vs Milla Pospisil / Graziana Weill6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1D - 4S:Cougars:Williams000000
2MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelis09211538312
3TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick09201639327
4MIT:Nice Aces:Perkins/Ferguson09181843338
5MRC:40+ 4.0:Cushnie09132352357
6KH:New Ad-Itudes:Brown010231737334
7CP:Net Gains 40+:das Neves/Sweet010231739338
8WTC:Game, Set, Match!:Myers/Chalupka010261442328
9WTC:Hit and Run:Tanner010182249362
10GCC:40+ Love:Lockwood/Castine010112965429

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Suzanne Crowe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.87
Claudia Lacasia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Melissa Dancy
published
3.79
Ann Garvey
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.76
Sue Broderick
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Barbara Hutchins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Hetal Kocinsky
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.58
Mary Zubrinsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Arlyn Davich
published 4
3.54
Deirdre Andreoli
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Gillian Sizer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Cher Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Tina Rivera
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Misao Naito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Kerstin Lebel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marykate Root
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marykate Root + Jane Kim17067% games+17.0% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Marykate Root6070% games+12.6% vs expected
Kerstin Lebel + Claudia Lacasia15459% games+7.8% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Claudia Lacasia1551% games+6.7% vs expected
Claudia Lacasia + Deirdre Andreoli10654% games+3.5% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Mary Zubrinsky311554% games+2.5% vs expected
Ann Garvey + Tina Rivera2346% games+1.0% vs expected
Claudia Lacasia + Marykate Root5258% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Crowe
17W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Claudia Lacasia
154W–83L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Melissa Dancy
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Ann Garvey
78W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Sue Broderick
149W–98L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Barbara Hutchins
26W–29L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Hetal Kocinsky
50W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Mary Zubrinsky
57W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Arlyn Davich
10W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Deirdre Andreoli
42W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gillian Sizer
80W–50L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Cher Anderson
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tina Rivera
101W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Misao Naito
38W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jane Kim
124W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kerstin Lebel
34W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marykate Root
58W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.