Teams

Team 3 Top Shelf

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-29vs Team 6Won 10
W#2 DoublesRaighne Delaney / David Torborg vs Sai Maddi / Daniel Caughey6-1, 6-2
2021-04-22vs Team 4 King of the CourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesZACHARY MOFFATT / David Torborg vs Scott Miller / Yong Kim6-4, 5-4
2021-04-15Split 11
W#1 DoublesRaighne Delaney / Kevin Thompson vs Mike Halpern / Dane Smith6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDavid Torborg vs Anthony Tran1-6, 5-4
2021-04-01vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesZACHARY MOFFATT / Raighne Delaney vs Jacques Beaudry-Losique / Kevin Dalzell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-25vs Team 11 Pirates Over 40Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJack O'Connell / David Torborg vs Chris Harirchian / Todd Irvin2-6, 3-6
2021-03-18vs Team 9 Big ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRaighne Delaney / ZACHARY MOFFATT vs Philip Stromer / Jonathan Marcus6-3, 6-4
2021-03-11vs Team 10 No Va AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Torborg / David Bennett vs Nicholas Bennett / Soheil Shirzadi3-6, 2-6
2021-02-26vs Team 8 VN RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesZACHARY MOFFATT / Mark Skibbie vs Dung Bui / Joseph Nguyen3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Robert Gazzola
published 4
Bruce McCulloch
published 4
ZACHARY MOFFATT
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
David Torborg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.64
Raighne Delaney
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
Kevin Thompson
published
Robert Easton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raighne Delaney + ZACHARY MOFFATT4160% gamesnot enough data
Raighne Delaney + David Torborg134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robert Gazzola
28W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Bruce McCulloch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
ZACHARY MOFFATT
30W–14L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
David Torborg
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Raighne Delaney
71W–67L career · 7 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Kevin Thompson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Easton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.