Teams

Team 6

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-29vs Team 3 Top ShelfLost 01
L#2 DoublesSai Maddi / Daniel Caughey vs Raighne Delaney / David Torborg1-6, 2-6
2021-04-16vs Team 2 Wise Ace GOATsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKarol Budniak / Sai Maddi vs Tom Ladenburg / Sumeet Chawla3-6, 1-6
2021-04-09vs Team 10 No Va AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Caughey / Murugavel Chengalvarayan vs Soheil Shirzadi / Nicholas Bennett3-6, 3-6
2021-03-28vs Team 9 Big ShotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Tai / Sai Maddi vs VI Huynh / Santosh Mohan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMurugavel Chengalvarayan / Atsushi Nakamura vs Mike Burgoyne / Barry Dickman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-03-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMurugavel Chengalvarayan / Sai Maddi vs Don Wu / Ly Dao0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-03-05vs Team 4 King of the CourtLost 01
L#2 DoublesMurugavel Chengalvarayan / Carlo Pizarro vs VIjay Chari / Glen Medina3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Murugavel Chengalvarayan
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Rodney Carpenter
published 4
Daniel Caughey
published 4
3.64
Eric Declerck
published 4
3.54
3.46
Sai Maddi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.23
Carlo Pizarro
published 3.5
Mitsuru Tanaka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sai Maddi + Murugavel Chengalvarayan3355% gamesnot enough data
Sai Maddi + Rodney Carpenter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Murugavel Chengalvarayan
304W–112L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Rodney Carpenter
33W–49L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Daniel Caughey
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Eric Declerck
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
Muthukrishnan Ganesan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Sai Maddi
73W–120L career · 4 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Carlo Pizarro
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Mitsuru Tanaka
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.