Teams

Hermitage Walsh

2021 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-29vs ACAC StallardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPam Walsh / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Kimberly Giancaspro / Judiann Drash6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarykay Stainback / Pam Vossenberg vs Ella Johnson / Suzy Weber4-6, 2-6
2021-07-22vs Monacan ColginLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Kauder / Sherri Phillips vs Lee Moore / Jane Riddle4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPam Vossenberg / Jennifer Polk vs Jane Taft / Kim Michael3-6, 5-7
2021-07-15vs MTC DowningWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Walsh / Jane Kauder vs Diana Duddy / Cindy Eramian6-0, 6-2
2021-07-14vs Willow Oaks JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Kauder / Sherri Phillips vs Perry Gunn / Julia Calamita6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-29vs ACAC StallardLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Kauder / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Karen Stallard / Suzy Weber4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-24vs Burkwood KampingaLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Vonderlehr Nolan / Judi Baker vs Lisa Adkins / Kimberley Winn2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPam Vossenberg / Jennifer Polk vs Rochelle Purmasir / Gail Russell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-17vs Raintree FallinWon 20
W#1 DoublesPam Walsh / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Janice McGarity / Valerie Caldwell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Vossenberg / Jennifer Polk vs Michele Riedel / Teresa Lancaster6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-03vs Monacan ColginWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Kauder / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan vs Therese Jones / Kristi King6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jane Kauder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Pam Walsh
published
3.55
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Sherri Phillips
published
3.48
Pam Vossenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Susan Valiquett
published
3.26
Kathy Ames
published
Jennifer Polk
published
Judi Baker
published
Linda Battle
published
Marykay Stainback
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Vonderlehr Nolan + Jane Kauder3257% gamesnot enough data
Jane Kauder + Pam Vossenberg314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan + Pam Vossenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jane Kauder
49W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Pam Walsh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.60
Susan Vonderlehr Nolan
105W–83L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Sherri Phillips
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Pam Vossenberg
72W–118L career · 4 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.48
Susan Valiquett
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
Kathy Ames
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Polk
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Judi Baker
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Battle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marykay Stainback
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.