Teams

TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart

2024 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-28vs Q MRC: Retro Slammers:Hawley/IslamLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Essary / Loretta Bohnen vs Alexandra Cabral / Diane Sullivan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Norma Zwart vs Dana Manning / Janet Zupkus3-6, 2-6
2024-07-18vs INT:We Got This!:Passios/DonnellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesTina Rivera / Susan Tibbetts vs Molly Howe / Sharon Jacobson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Chen / Mary Matera vs Jacqueline Passios / Dana Yao6-2, 6-1
2024-06-23vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdLost 12
L#1 DoublesNorma Zwart / Tina Rivera vs Kimberly Gacso / Rae Varrone3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Susan Tibbetts vs AMY MCCORMACK / Pamela Riess6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Essary / Laurie Perry vs Jodi Wasserstein / Maureen Conard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-09vs GF:Body Shots:GoodrichWon 21
L#1 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Dale Norton vs Maureen Goodrich / Debbie Kelly5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Matera / Janice Lucchesi vs Jennifer Young / Christine Kane6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNorma Zwart / Tina Rivera vs Wendy Chicosky / Mary Glidden6-4, 6-4
2024-06-02vs WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:BentoLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Rivera / Norma Zwart vs Colleen Moody / Nadine Tanen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Lucchesi / Priscilla Twombly vs Ellyn Ulfsson / Karen Greenblatt4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Mehai / Dale Norton vs Anna Eliseenkova / Myra Goldberg6-1, 6-4
2024-05-19vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesCher Anderson / Lisa Chen vs Lynn Atkins / Julie Bastarache6-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Essary / Mary Matera vs Antonina Korepina / Nadine Morandi2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Mary Lou Ramery vs Bobbi Deangelis / Arla Wiles2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-04vs WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:BentoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMisao Naito / Norma Zwart vs Karen Greenblatt / Nadine Tanen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Tibbetts / Loretta Bohnen vs Ellyn Ulfsson / Jamie Katz6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Chen / Dale Norton vs Nancy Bento / Lauren Zirn6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-14vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 21
L#1 DoublesCher Anderson / Debbie Kemp-Weiss vs Susan Jones / Jill Vitti5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMisao Naito / Margaret Mehai vs Cynthia Pezzullo / Lisa Frisbie6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Essary / Mary Matera vs Pauline Hudson / Pamela Riess6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-07vs GF:Body Shots:GoodrichLost 03
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Diana Louw vs Debbie Kelly / Amy Blume2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNorma Zwart / Laurie Perry vs Catherine Dinauer / Maureen Goodrich3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Mehai / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs Mary Glidden / Susan Dellenbaugh6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-10vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Essary / Cher Anderson vs Terry Nolan / Lynn Atkins2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Diana Louw vs Maggie Nava / Stefanie Kreiger2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNelida Reyes-Matos / Dale Norton vs Bobbi Deangelis / Jeanne Consiglio3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven01025511182
2CP: Silver Foxes:Auch/Curtin01021923223
3Q MRC: Retro Slammers:Hawley/Islam010191123227
4CP:Shades of Play:Stone010161227249
5GF:Body Shots:Goodrich010191028246
64S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff010161233272
7WTC:Simply Smashing:Swanson/Catto010141435264
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Bento010161435277
94S:Slice Girls:Honey/Lawton010131337285
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd010121740310
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart010102043281
12INT:We Got This!:Passios/Donnelly01032754337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cher Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Tina Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Mary Matera
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Diane Essary
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Priscilla Twombly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Misao Naito
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Mary Lou Ramery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Dale Norton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Loretta Bohnen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.91
Diana Louw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Cheryl Dziubina
published 3.5
2.68
Margaret Mehai
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Diana Jackson
published 3
2.63
Nelida Reyes-Matos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie Kemp-Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janice Lucchesi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Perry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Chen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Norma Zwart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Tibbetts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dale Norton + Tina Rivera4452% games+3.4% vs expected
Misao Naito + Priscilla Twombly101246% games−3.3% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Dale Norton3647% games−3.3% vs expected
Diana Louw + Priscilla Twombly4644% games−3.5% vs expected
Mary Lou Ramery + Loretta Bohnen61449% games−4.2% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Priscilla Twombly2642% games−6.4% vs expected
Norma Zwart + Priscilla Twombly8950% games−9.6% vs expected
Loretta Bohnen + Priscilla Twombly5850% games−11.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cher Anderson
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Rivera
93W–118L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
Mary Matera
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Diane Essary
16W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Priscilla Twombly
61W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Misao Naito
36W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Mary Lou Ramery
12W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Dale Norton
49W–101L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Loretta Bohnen
47W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Diana Louw
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
3.5
Cheryl Dziubina
16W–34L career · type S · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Margaret Mehai
47W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Diana Jackson
12W–25L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65
Nelida Reyes-Matos
31W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Debbie Kemp-Weiss
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Janice Lucchesi
45W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Perry
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Chen
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Norma Zwart
30W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Tibbetts
18W–27L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.