Teams

4S:Slice Girls:Honey/Lawton

2024 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-28vs 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/GiffLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Lawton / Mari Inagami vs Christiane Goldman / Stephanie Mercado2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWendy English / Patricia Rinaldi vs Carven Albanese / Janel Downs7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Moss / Nancy Meany vs Jane Lucas / Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen3-6, 4-6
2024-07-21vs CP: Silver Foxes:Auch/CurtinLost 03
L#1 DoublesMari Inagami / Elizabeth Rose vs KENDLE ARCIDIACONO / Amy Lerner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Honey / Jennifer Lawton vs Kim Athan / Katherine Curtin1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Meany / Patricia Rinaldi vs Madelyn Jolliffe / Marianne Flayhan0-6, 3-6
2024-06-30vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy English / Patricia Rinaldi vs Ellen Clarke / Marjan Verhelst6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Lawton / Leslie Moss vs Angela Jameson / Beth Pearce5-7, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Honey / Lu Li vs Elena Burova / Carla Carroll7-5, 7-5
2024-06-02vs WTC:Simply Smashing:Swanson/CattoWon 30
W#1 DoublesMari Inagami / Elizabeth Rose vs Alexandra Nicklas / Helene Ginsburg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Honey / Nancy Meany vs Deanna Santoro / Ellen Leigh6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine L Andersen / Darcy Haskins vs Jennifer Corrado / Tina Reiser6-3, 5-7
2024-05-19vs 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/GiffLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy English / Elizabeth Rose vs Shannon Craley / Stephanie Mercado2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Cochran / Margaret Honey vs Janel Downs / Carven Albanese4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLu Li / Leslie Moss vs Christiane Goldman / Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen1-6, 0-6
2024-04-21vs CP: Silver Foxes:Auch/CurtinLost 03
L#1 DoublesMari Inagami / Elizabeth Rose vs KENDLE ARCIDIACONO / Karen Malek2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWendy English / Patricia Rinaldi vs Nicole Berman / Katherine Curtin5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMargaret Honey / Jennifer Lawton vs Diane Falconer / Ann Horowitz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-07vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMari Inagami / Elizabeth Rose vs Susan Decker / Ellen Clarke7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Honey / Jennifer Lawton vs Cindy Lannon / Angela Jameson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracy Haddad / Lisa DiCandido vs Elena Burova / Barbara Freiler6-0, 6-0
2024-03-24vs CP:Shades of Play:StoneLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Meany / Margaret Honey vs Anne Castine / Dorothy Brill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy English / Patricia Rinaldi vs Malee Sparagna / Kathleen DiSalvatore6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDarcy Haskins / Catherine L Andersen vs Maria Das Neves / Kathryn Pizzuto3-6, 4-6
2024-03-17vs CP:Shades of Play:StoneLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy English / Elizabeth Rose vs Lee Wipper / Sharon Hawkins6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Cochran / Jennifer Lawton vs Dorothy Brill / Malee Sparagna5-7, 4-3
L#3 DoublesLisa DiCandido / Tracy Haddad vs Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros / Nadine Shaoul7-6, 3-4
2024-03-10vs WTC:Simply Smashing:Swanson/CattoWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Rose / Mari Inagami vs Lorraine Campo / Christine Moore3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Honey / Patricia Rinaldi vs Eileen Troise / Katharine Ashworth2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Belden / Lu Li vs Ellen Leigh / Deanna Santoro6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven01025511182
2CP: Silver Foxes:Auch/Curtin01021923223
3Q MRC: Retro Slammers:Hawley/Islam010191123227
4CP:Shades of Play:Stone010161227249
5GF:Body Shots:Goodrich010191028246
64S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff010161233272
7WTC:Simply Smashing:Swanson/Catto010141435264
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Bento010161435277
94S:Slice Girls:Honey/Lawton010131337285
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd010121740310
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart010102043281
12INT:We Got This!:Passios/Donnelly01032754337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Lisa DiCandido
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Catherine L Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Wendy English
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Darcy Haskins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Rose
published 3.5
3.23
Julie Lowitz
published
3.12
Leslie Moss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Nancy Meany
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Patricia Rinaldi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.81
Sandra Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Tracy Haddad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.71
Kate Beck
published 3
Jennifer Lawton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Julie Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lu Li
published
Margaret Honey
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mari Inagami
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Belden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mari Inagami + Lisa DiCandido5262% games+14.8% vs expected
Nancy Meany + Leslie Moss4648% games+12.4% vs expected
Margaret Honey + Nancy Meany9656% games+10.6% vs expected
Jennifer Lawton + Lisa DiCandido6265% games+9.8% vs expected
Jennifer Lawton + Margaret Honey5647% games+3.0% vs expected
Jennifer Lawton + Julie Cochran2351% games+3.0% vs expected
Darcy Haskins + Patricia Rinaldi51047% games+0.1% vs expected
Wendy English + Patricia Rinaldi4254% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa DiCandido
124W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Catherine L Andersen
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Wendy English
41W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Darcy Haskins
30W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Rose
21W–27L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Lowitz
55W–51L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Leslie Moss
50W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Nancy Meany
63W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
Patricia Rinaldi
60W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sandra Rose
84W–117L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Tracy Haddad
62W–48L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Kate Beck
65W–75L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Jennifer Lawton
38W–77L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Cochran
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lu Li
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Honey
64W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mari Inagami
63W–72L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Belden
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.