Teams

SGV HFA Tennis Club-Esparza-Downey High School/SA1

2025 Mixed Tri Level - 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-09vs SGV Mixed Nuts-Hwang-Flint/SU4Lost 01
L#2 DoublesArnold Lopez / Paula Quesada vs Kevin Rodriguez / Carter Ashforth1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Quesada / Nicolas Velazco vs Sandy Weyant / Oscar Alberto Bonilla3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJoshua Esparza / Paula Quesada vs Ramiro Rivas / Nat Newton6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU12Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaula Quesada / Nicolas Velazco vs Chun Wong / Mei Wong3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicolas Velazco / Paula Quesada vs Andrea Dunlop / Jordan Gaskins6-1, 6-1
2025-09-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoshua Esparza / Paula Quesada vs Cynthia Garcia / Hank Gwon2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ana Cortez
published 4
3.36
Joshua Esparza
published
3.32
Arnold Lopez
published 4
3.31
Paula Quesada
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Paige Sturley
published
3.21
Adriana Higuera
published 3.5
3.16
Nicolas Velazco
published
3.13
Ariana Garcia
published 3
2.90
Giovanni Leguizamon
published
2.88
Sergio Salas
published
Elizabeth Aceves
published
Kevin Citalan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Quesada + Nicolas Velazco8258% games+9.3% vs expected
Joshua Esparza + Ariana Garcia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Cortez
6W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Joshua Esparza
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
4
Arnold Lopez
15W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Paula Quesada
17W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Paige Sturley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Adriana Higuera
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Nicolas Velazco
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Ariana Garcia
31W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Giovanni Leguizamon
22W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.90
Sergio Salas
36W–20L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Elizabeth Aceves
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Citalan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.