Teams

Medel 18s TriLevel 5.0/4.5/4.0 Sunday

2026 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesTiffany Vanhpraseuth / Mariana Hollman vs Ella Olexa / Asha Iyengar6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAi Terui / Jane Owens vs Morgan Danford / Jennifer Smith3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Mays / Sarah Blacutt vs Leslie Marus / Brittany Furr2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRosa Tapia / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth vs Gabrielle Wreder / Kate Meiners6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Ai Terui vs Melissa Agner / Annabel Weyand Norman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Blacutt / Jennifer Mays vs Lindsay Ray / Lauren Nutt6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJane Owens / Mariana Hollman vs Madeline Brown / Sydney Bly5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Jemina Sorman vs Tiffany Brown / Kate Meiners4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mays / Sarah Blacutt vs Lauren Nutt / Jordan Hedrick6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesTiffany Vanhpraseuth / Mariana Hollman vs Juliana Craft / Asha Iyengar3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Amanda Arkaev vs Morgan Danford / Jennifer Chiaramonti4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAdriana Hernandez / Alejandra Hernandez Medel vs Stephanie Bettinger / Christina Campbell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRosa Tapia / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth vs Jamie Breunig / Gabrielle Wreder6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdriana Hernandez / Sarah Blacutt vs Jordan Hedrick / Sarah Dunning4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTiffany Vanhpraseuth / Mariana Hollman vs Ella Olexa / Asha Iyengar6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAi Terui / Jane Owens vs Jennifer Smith / Christina Rush4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdriana Hernandez / Sarah Blacutt vs Brittany Furr / Christina Campbell7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRosa Tapia / Tiffany Vanhpraseuth vs Annabel Weyand Norman / Gabrielle Wreder5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlejandra Hernandez Medel / Jennifer Mays vs Lauren Nutt / Marla Barnwell6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTiffany Vanhpraseuth / Bety Miranda vs Juliana Craft / Asha Iyengar0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Ai Terui vs Jennifer Chiaramonti / Elizabeth Gill3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAlejandra Hernandez Medel / Sarah Blacutt vs Stephanie Bettinger / Brittany Furr6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Rosa Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.59
Bety Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.45
Tiffany Vanhpraseuth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Amanda Arkaev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Ai Terui
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.08
Jane Owens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Sarah Blacutt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Jessica Bair-Epps
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.94
Samantha Harlow
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.78
Alejandra Hernandez Medel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Adriana Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Jennifer Mays
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Loni Worsley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Hernandez + Alejandra Hernandez Medel3352% games−0.1% vs expected
Rosa Tapia + Tiffany Vanhpraseuth303 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Blacutt + Jennifer Mays213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosa Tapia
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Bety Miranda
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
Tiffany Vanhpraseuth
9W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.45
4.5
Amanda Arkaev
9W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Ai Terui
9W–10L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Jane Owens
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Sarah Blacutt
6W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.03
Jessica Bair-Epps
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Samantha Harlow
10W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
4
Alejandra Hernandez Medel
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Adriana Hernandez
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Jennifer Mays
70W–41L career · 10 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Loni Worsley
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.