Teams

Kelley/Murfreesboro

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over Monday Evening · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-20vs Eubank/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Blankenship / Jan Phanthalangsy vs Cassie Bourdon / Brenda Monajjem6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Hicks / Tricia Davis vs Autumn Brown / Cindy Chaffin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeth Watson / Margaret Bramlett vs Lidia Zaharcu / Katie Neel4-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs Eubank/MurfreesboroLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kelley / Angela Blankenship vs Suzanne Eubank / Melanie Shipp6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesConnie Pearce / Shannon Fox vs Julie LaLance / Beth Frame5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Bramlett / Beth Watson vs Gina Floyd / Marilyn Tenpenny4-6, 5-7
2026-06-29vs Eubank/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith vs Mary Elam Polk / Tonia Porter4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesConnie Pearce / Shannon Fox vs Cindy Chaffin / Robyn Atkinson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Watson / Carmen Greenberg vs Jennifer Orr / Gina Floyd6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-22vs Eubank/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kelley / Collier Andress Smith vs Cassie Bourdon / Brenda Monajjem6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Hicks / Connie Pearce vs Autumn Brown / Beth Frame6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephanie Kinard / Carmen Greenberg vs Lidia Zaharcu / Katie Neel4-6, 4-6
2026-06-15vs Eubank/MurfreesboroWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Blankenship / Jan Phanthalangsy vs Meredith Koffman / Cassie Bourdon6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Gaither / Margaret Bramlett vs Katie Neel / Lidia Zaharcu0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Eubank/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesCollier Andress Smith / Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith vs Mary Elam Polk / Cassie Bourdon3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Hicks / Connie Pearce vs Beth Frame / Cindy Chaffin2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Gaither / Stephanie Kinard vs Gina Floyd / Marilyn Tenpenny6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Collier Andress Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Joy Owens
published
3.55
Jan Phanthalangsy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Angela Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Shannon Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Tricia Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Connie Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Pamela Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Stephanie Kinard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Susan Gaither
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Margaret Bramlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Beth Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Carmen Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Gaither + Margaret Bramlett8459% games+9.2% vs expected
Connie Pearce + Shannon Fox224 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Fox + Jan Phanthalangsy224 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Bramlett + Stephanie Kinard314 matchesnot enough data
Connie Pearce + Pamela Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Hicks + Angela Blankenship123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Gaither + Stephanie Kinard123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Watson + Margaret Bramlett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Collier Andress Smith
31W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Joy Owens
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jan Phanthalangsy
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Angela Blankenship
21W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
Shannon Fox
37W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
Tricia Davis
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Connie Pearce
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Pamela Hicks
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Stephanie Kinard
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Susan Gaither
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Margaret Bramlett
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Watson
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
3
Carmen Greenberg
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.