Teams

Chapman 3.0 65 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 65 & Over · 3.0 Women 65 & Over Mon afternoon

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-10vs Cober 3.0 65 MonWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Varner / Katy Vuncannon vs Suzanne Ponting / Noreena Cole6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElaine Ashley / Bobbi McEntee vs Anne Cober / Susan Cole6-3, 6-0
2023-04-03vs Cober 3.0 65 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetty Smith / Brenda Varner vs Susan Cole / Judy Bencini6-2, 6-2
2023-03-27vs Cober 3.0 65 MonWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaty Vuncannon / Bobbi McEntee vs Anne Cober / Noreena Cole6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Partagas / Brenda Varner vs Teresa Bowen / Suzanne Ponting6-4, 6-4
2023-03-13vs Cober 3.0 65 MonWon 10
W#3 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Linda Shuster vs Jeannie Applegate / Renuka Shivaji6-4, 6-2
2023-03-06vs Cober 3.0 65 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Chapman / Brenda Varner vs Bette Boone / Donna Range6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 65 & Over Mon afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Brenda Varner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Betty Smith
published 3
2.84
Eleanor Redding
published
2.83
Ila Rosenthal
published
2.82
Linda Chapman
published
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published
2.66
Susan Wrenn
published
2.62
Linda Shuster
published
2.62
Lori Partagas
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
2.41
Bobbi McEntee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Fran Jones
published
Katy Vuncannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Chapman + Faye Halvorsen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brenda Varner
137W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Betty Smith
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
2.83
Linda Chapman
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Faye Halvorsen
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Susan Wrenn
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Linda Shuster
19W–24L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Lori Partagas
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.41
Fran Jones
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katy Vuncannon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.