Hoy-40/6.5/M-Francos

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44

David Bachemin

usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5

3.29

Bryan Quarls

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.21

CLAY BENTON

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.15

James Tickner

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.10

Bill Bass

usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

2.72

Adam Scarbrough

usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3

2.55

Jody Harper

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published —

—

Jason Bragg

usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —

—

John Shylock

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Klint Beckendorf

usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Mark Glassett

usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Mark Mercante

usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 7% · published —

—

Randy Hasling

usually #3 Doubles 68%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published —

—

Robert Barrosse

usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published —

—

Timothy Hoy

usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

William Knight

published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Barrosse + Mark Glassett	3–2	55% games	not enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Mark Glassett	1–4	38% games	not enough data
Timothy Hoy + Randy Hasling	1–3	4 matches	not enough data
James Tickner + Bill Bass	0–3	3 matches	not enough data
James Tickner + Mark Mercante	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
James Tickner + Bryan Quarls	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Bill Bass + Timothy Hoy	2–1	3 matches	not enough data
Bill Bass + Adam Scarbrough	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

David Bachemin

13W–14L career · 13 lines in 2026

<1%69%31%

3.44

3.5

Bryan Quarls

11W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026

1%93%5%

3.29

3.5

CLAY BENTON

13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026

5%93%1%

3.21

3.5

James Tickner

16W–23L career · 15 lines in 2026

12%88%<1%

3.15

3.5

Bill Bass

17W–22L career · 20 lines in 2026

23%77%<1%

3.10

Adam Scarbrough

14W–33L career · 26 lines in 2026

5%94%2%

2.72

—

Jody Harper

12W–46L career · 18 lines in 2026

36%64%<1%

2.55

—

Jason Bragg

4W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

John Shylock

39W–31L career · 30 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Klint Beckendorf

16W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mark Glassett

19W–47L career · 22 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mark Mercante

8W–6L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Randy Hasling

14W–27L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Robert Barrosse

14W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Timothy Hoy

13W–25L career · 20 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

William Knight

0W–1L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.