Griffin-40/3.5/M-N. Cypress

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29

Ryan Wadenpfuhl

usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —

3.27

Aaron Sinclair

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5

2.93

David LeBreton

usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3

2.77

Cody Westmoreland

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3

2.38

Billy Beasley

usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 2.5

2.36

Chris Shipp

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5

—

Donald Sharman

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Hristo Balev

usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published —

—

John Carr III

usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published —

—

Sal Ruffino

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Warren Griffin

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Sinclair + Cody Westmoreland	2–2	4 matches	not enough data
Ryan Wadenpfuhl + Warren Griffin	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Billy Beasley + Warren Griffin	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Billy Beasley + Sal Ruffino	0–3	3 matches	not enough data
Warren Griffin + Aaron Sinclair	0–3	3 matches	not enough data
Warren Griffin + David LeBreton	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Cody Westmoreland + Hristo Balev	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Ryan Wadenpfuhl

22W–27L career · 15 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

3.29

3.5

Aaron Sinclair

15W–30L career · 22 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.27

David LeBreton

7W–13L career · type A · 12 lines in 2026

<1%68%32%

2.93

Cody Westmoreland

17W–28L career · 27 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

2.77

2.5

Billy Beasley

7W–30L career · 27 lines in 2026

0%79%21%

2.38

2.5

Chris Shipp

0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026

0%83%17%

2.36

—

Donald Sharman

3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Hristo Balev

10W–18L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

John Carr III

4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sal Ruffino

0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Warren Griffin

17W–42L career · 34 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.