Teams

BC-MCC/RachelAlexander

2024 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kirsten Helvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Angela Dax
published 4
3.80
Pamela Lopez
published
3.78
Stephanie Twombley
published
Amy Karr
published 4
3.75
Beth Rager
published 4
3.73
Sonja Harrington
published
3.73
Renee Tinker
published
3.71
Mariel VandenHengel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Elizabeth Alexander
published
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
published
3.56
Layla Kiffin
published
3.51
Kristina Mohr
published
3.48
Erin Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.11
Rachel Alexander
published
MaryAnn Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonja Harrington + Kirsten Helvey5452% games−5.4% vs expected
Erin Freeman + Ethylene Ziegler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kirsten Helvey
123W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Angela Dax
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Stephanie Twombley
23W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Amy Karr
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Beth Rager
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Sonja Harrington
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Mariel VandenHengel
31W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Ethylene Ziegler
87W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Sarah Nedelman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Layla Kiffin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Erin Freeman
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
MaryAnn Burns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.